Administrative Law One Liner Notes

Download Android App Download iOS App
Note: 1. Use ORG Code: XLVPGR For IOS and Web APP. 2. To Download the PDF it is necessary to download the App. 3. You can Use Only Sigle Device to access the Courses on App

Download Administrative Law One Liner Notes PDF

Download All MCQs + One Liner Notes Of This Act PDF

Also Explore:

Administrative Law Important Case Laws

There are 2 Sets of MCQs available for Administrative Law, you are advised to explore all the sets :

Administrative Law MCQs Set -1

Administrative Law MCQs Set -2

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

CHAPTER-1
NATURE AND SCOPE OF ADMINSTRATIVE LAW
1.1 MEANING AND DEFINITION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter under this Chapter?	It explains the concept, scope and juristic definitions of administrative law.
To which branch of law does Administrative Law belong?	Administrative law is a branch of public law.
What does Administrative Law primarily deal with?	It deals with the structure, powers, functions and control of administrative authorities.
Why has the importance of administrative law increased in modern governance?	Because the role of administration has expanded enormously.
What relationship is primarily regulated by administrative law?	The relationship between the State and individuals.
What does administrative law ensure regarding administrative authorities?	It ensures that administrative authorities exercise their powers within the limits prescribed by law.
What does administrative law prevent administrative authorities from doing?	Acting arbitrarily.
In simple terms, what does administrative law govern?	The activities of the executive branch of government.
What mechanisms does administrative law provide?	Mechanisms to control misuse of administrative powers.
How have various jurists approached the definition of administrative law?	They have defined administrative law in different ways.
How did Ivor Jennings define administrative law?	Administrative law is the law relating to administration determining the organization, powers and duties of administrative authorities.
According to Dicey, what does administrative law denote?	It denotes that portion of law which determines the legal status and liabilities of all State officials.
How did Wade define administrative law?	It is the law which controls the exercise of governmental power.
How did Garner define administrative law?	It is the body of rules which regulate the activities of administrative agencies of the government.
What is the first major aspect of administrative law derived from the definitions?	The powers and functions of administrative authorities.
What is the second major aspect of administrative law derived from the definitions?	The procedures followed by administrative authorities.
What is the third major aspect of administrative law derived from the definitions?	The remedies available to individuals against administrative action.
What is the ultimate function of administrative law in governance?	It acts as a mechanism for controlling governmental power.
How does administrative law protect citizens?	By protecting the rights of citizens against administrative action.

1.2 NATURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter of Nature of Administrative Law?	It explains the distinctive features and characteristics of administrative law.
Of which branch of law does administrative law form a part?	Administrative law forms part of public law.
What type of relationship is regulated by administrative law?	The relationship between individuals and the State.
What type of relationships are not primarily regulated by administrative law?	Relationships between private individuals.
What authorities and bodies are primarily dealt with in administrative law?	Administrative authorities and agencies.
What are examples of administrative authorities and agencies under administrative law?	Government departments, regulatory authorities, commissions and other public bodies performing administrative functions.
What does administrative law provide control over?	The exercise of administrative powers.
What does administrative law ensure regarding the actions of administrative authorities?	That they act within the limits of their authority.
What procedural requirement must administrative authorities follow under administrative law?	They must follow fair procedures.
What is an important characteristic regarding the development of administrative law?	It is dynamic and continuously evolving.
Why does administrative law continuously evolve?	Because the functions of government expand and new administrative agencies are created.
What develops as new administrative agencies are created?	New principles of administrative law develop.
What is the role of courts in the development of administrative law?	Courts have played a crucial role in developing its principles.
Which principles of administrative law have been developed by courts?	Natural justice, reasonableness, proportionality and judicial review.
What does administrative law emphasize in governance?	Accountability and fairness.
What balance does administrative law seek to maintain?	A balance between efficient administration and protection of individual rights.

1.3 DEVELOPMENT OF ADMINSTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter of the Development of Administrative Law?	It explains how administrative law developed due to the expansion of governmental functions.
What is the historical nature of administrative law as a branch of law?	Administrative law is a relatively modern branch of law.
Why did administrative law develop in modern states?	Due to the expansion of governmental functions.
What concept of state existed in earlier times before the welfare state?	The concept of a police state.
What was the nature of government functions under the police state?	The role of government was very limited.
With what functions was the State primarily concerned in a police state?	Maintaining law and order, defense and collection of taxes.
What type of state led to the expansion of governmental functions?	The welfare state.
How did the role of government change under the welfare state?	The role of government expanded significantly.
What services are modern governments expected to provide under the welfare state?	Education, health care, employment, housing and social security.
Why was it necessary to establish administrative agencies in modern governance?	To implement government policies.
What powers began to be exercised by administrative agencies?	Extensive powers affecting the rights of citizens.
Why was it necessary to develop legal principles to regulate administrative agencies?	Because administrative agencies exercised extensive powers affecting citizens' rights.
What resulted from the need to regulate and control administrative powers?	The growth of administrative law.

1.4 REASONS FOR THE RAPID GROWTH OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter of the Factors Responsible for the Growth of Administrative Law?	It explains the reasons that contributed to the rapid development of administrative law.
What is one of the most important reasons for the development of administrative law?	The emergence of the welfare state.
Why do welfare states require administrative agencies?	Because modern governments perform numerous welfare functions.
How does the complexity of modern governance contribute to the development of administrative law?	Legislative bodies cannot deal with every detail of administration.
What solution is adopted when legislatures cannot manage administrative details?	Certain powers are delegated to administrative authorities.
What is the process of transferring powers from the legislature to administrative authorities called?	Delegation of powers.
What advantage do administrative agencies possess in handling complex matters?	They possess technical expertise.
Why are administrative agencies better suited than legislatures or courts in certain matters?	Because they can handle complex matters more efficiently due to technical expertise.
How do administrative procedures differ from traditional judicial processes?	Administrative procedures are more flexible and speedy.
Why are administrative agencies suitable for specialized matters?	Because their procedures are flexible and speedy.
What legislative practice has significantly contributed to the development of administrative law?	The growth of delegated legislation.

1.5 CONCEPTUAL OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE GROWTH OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter of the Conceptual Objections Against the Growth of Administrative Law?	It explains the criticisms raised against the growth of administrative law.
How has the growth of administrative law been viewed by several scholars?	It has been criticized by several scholars.
What is one of the main criticisms against administrative law?	It may lead to excessive concentration of power in the hands of administrative authorities.
Why do critics oppose wide discretionary powers in administrative authorities?	Because they may lead to arbitrary and authoritarian administration.
What objection is raised regarding administrative procedures?	They often lack the safeguards available in ordinary courts.
How do administrative tribunals differ from ordinary courts regarding procedural rules?	They may not strictly follow the rules of evidence and procedure.
What criticism is made against delegated legislation?	It allows the executive to exercise legislative powers.
What concern exists regarding the proliferation of administrative tribunals?	It may weaken the role of ordinary courts.
Despite criticisms, why is administrative law considered necessary?	It is essential for the functioning of modern governments.

1.5A CONCEPT OF RULE OF LAW
What is the subject matter of the Doctrine of Rule of Law?	It explains the fundamental principles of rule of law in democratic governance.
What is the nature of the doctrine of Rule of Law?	It is a fundamental principle of democratic governance.
Who developed the doctrine of Rule of Law?	A.V. Dicey.
Through how many principles did Dicey explain the concept of rule of law?	Three principles.
What is the first principle of the rule of law according to Dicey?	Supremacy of law.
What does the principle of supremacy of law mean according to Dicey?	No person can be punished except for a breach of law established before ordinary courts.
What type of power has no place under the rule of law?	Arbitrary power.
What is the second principle of the rule of law according to Dicey?	Equality before law.
What does the principle of equality before law mean?	Every person, whether a private individual or a government official, is subject to the same law administered by ordinary courts.
What is the third principle of the rule of law according to Dicey?	Predominance of legal spirit.
What did Dicey mean by predominance of legal spirit?	Protection of individual rights should be ensured through judicial decisions rather than through constitutional declarations alone.
What system of administrative justice did Dicey criticize while explaining the rule of law?	The system of droit administratif in France.
What is meant by the system of droit administratif criticized by Dicey?	A system where separate administrative tribunals decide disputes between government and citizens.
Why did Dicey criticize the French system of droit administratif?	Because it allowed separate administrative tribunals for government-citizen disputes.
According to Dicey, what does the system of droit administratif negate?	The concept of rule of law.
According to Dicey, what is considered the secret of Englishman's liberty?	The concept of rule of law.
What conclusion did Dicey draw regarding administrative law in England?	That there is no administrative law in England.
According to Dicey, the rule of law as formulated by him was a principle of which constitution?	The English Constitution.
What does the supreme law, i.e., the Constitution, subject under the rule of law?	Every organ of the State.
Within what framework are the rights and duties of citizens enforced according to Dicey?	Within the broader framework of the Constitution.
Where did Dicey later show a change of heart regarding administrative adjudication?	In the long introduction to the eighth edition of "The Law of the Constitution".
What doubt did Dicey express in the eighth edition of "The Law of the Constitution"?	Whether law courts were best suited to adjudicate upon mistakes or offences of civil servants.
What alternative institutional mechanism did Dicey consider for deciding administrative disputes?	A body of persons combining legal knowledge with official experience and independent of government.
Why did Dicey consider such a specialized body for administrative adjudication?	Because it might enforce official law more effectively than the High Court.

1.5B APPLICATION OF RULE OF LAW IN INDIA
What is the subject matter of the Rule of Law in the Indian Constitutional System?	It explains the place and recognition of the rule of law in the Indian Constitution.
What is the status of the rule of law in the Indian constitutional system?	It forms a fundamental part of the Indian constitutional system.
What do several provisions of the Constitution reflect regarding governance?	The principle of rule of law.
Which Article of the Constitution guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws?	Article 14.
What does Article 14 of the Constitution guarantee?	Equality before law and equal protection of laws.
Which Article of the Constitution protects the right to life and personal liberty?	Article 21.
What right is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution?	The right to life and personal liberty.
Which Articles empower courts to enforce fundamental rights through writ jurisdiction?	Article 32 and Article 226.
What power is granted to courts under Articles 32 and 226?	The power to enforce fundamental rights through writ jurisdiction.
How has the Supreme Court recognized the rule of law in the Constitution?	As part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that rule of law is part of the basic structure?	Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973).
What principle regarding the Constitution was affirmed in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)?	Rule of law is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
In which case did the Supreme Court emphasize that rule of law is a basic feature of the Constitution?	Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975).
What did the Supreme Court emphasize in Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)?	That rule of law is a basic feature of the Constitution.

1.5C DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS
What is the subject matter of the Doctrine of Separation of Powers?	It explains the division of governmental powers among different organs of the State.
Who developed the doctrine of separation of powers?	The French philosopher Montesquieu.
In which work did Montesquieu explain the doctrine of separation of powers?	L'Esprit des Lois.
According to the doctrine of separation of powers, into how many organs should governmental powers be divided?	Three organs.
Which three organs are recognized under the doctrine of separation of powers?	Legislature, Executive and Judiciary.
What is the function of the Legislature under the doctrine of separation of powers?	To make laws.
What is the function of the Executive under the doctrine of separation of powers?	To implement and enforce laws.
What is the function of the Judiciary under the doctrine of separation of powers?	To interpret laws and administer justice.
What is the main purpose of the doctrine of separation of powers?	To prevent concentration of power and protect individual liberty.
Does the Indian Constitution follow strict separation of powers?	No, it does not follow strict separation of powers.
What type of separation of powers is adopted by the Indian Constitution?	Functional separation of powers.
What is meant by functional separation of powers in India?	Each organ performs its primary functions but may exercise certain overlapping powers.
Which case clarified the position of separation of powers in the Indian Constitution?	Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab (1955).
What did the Supreme Court hold in Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab (1955) regarding separation of powers?	The Constitution does not strictly separate powers but recognizes functional separation.

1.6 NEED FOR THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
What is the subject matter of the Need for the Study of Administrative Law?	It explains the importance of studying administrative law in modern legal systems.
Why is the study of administrative law essential in modern legal systems?	Because administrative authorities exercise wide powers affecting citizens.
What is the impact of administrative authorities' powers on citizens?	They directly affect the lives of citizens.
Why is it necessary to regulate the powers of administrative authorities?	To ensure that such powers are exercised lawfully and fairly.
What framework does administrative law provide regarding administrative powers?	A framework for controlling administrative discretion.
What abuse does administrative law seek to prevent?	Abuse of administrative power.
What rights does administrative law aim to protect?	Individual rights.
What governance values are promoted by administrative law?	Transparency, accountability and good governance.
Why has administrative law become one of the most important branches of public law?	Because it regulates wide administrative powers and protects citizens' rights in modern governance.

CHAPTER-2
DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of the Meaning of Delegated Legislation?	It explains the concept and nature of delegated legislation.
What is delegated legislation?	Law made by an authority other than the legislature but under the authority of the legislature.
Under whose authority is delegated legislation made?	Under the authority of the legislature.
To whom does the legislature usually delegate its law-making power?	To the executive or administrative authorities.
For what purpose does the legislature delegate law-making power?	To frame rules, regulations, bye-laws, notifications or orders to implement the provisions of a statute.
What types of instruments are commonly framed under delegated legislation?	Rules, regulations, bye-laws, notifications and orders.
By what other name is delegated legislation known as subordinate legislation?	Subordinate legislation.
By what other name is delegated legislation known as secondary legislation?	Secondary legislation.
By what other name is delegated legislation known as executive legislation?	Executive legislation.
What type of statutes are enacted by legislatures in modern administrative states?	Parent statutes or enabling Acts.
What do parent statutes or enabling Acts provide?	The framework of the law.
Who fills in the details of the law under delegated legislation?	Administrative authorities.
How are details of the law provided under delegated legislation?	Through rules, regulations and other subordinate legislation.
What example illustrates delegated legislation in environmental protection laws?	Parliament may pass an Act on environmental protection and authorize the government to frame detailed rules on pollution standards.
What is the essential feature of delegated legislation?	It is legislation made by subordinate authorities under powers delegated by the legislature.

2.1 NEED FOR DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of the Need for Delegated Legislation?	It explains the reasons for the delegation of legislative power in modern governance.
Why has delegated legislation become an essential feature of modern governance?	Because several practical factors require delegation of legislative power.
What is the first major reason for delegated legislation?	Pressure on the legislature.
Why do modern legislatures face difficulty in making detailed laws?	Because they have an enormous legislative workload.
How does delegated legislation reduce the burden on the legislature?	By allowing administrative authorities to make detailed rules.
What is the second reason for the need for delegated legislation?	Technical expertise.
Why are administrative authorities better suited to frame detailed regulations?	Because they possess specialized knowledge and technical expertise.
What is the third reason for delegated legislation?	Flexibility.
How does delegated legislation provide flexibility in governance?	Administrative authorities can modify rules quickly according to changing circumstances.
Why is delegated legislation useful in changing circumstances?	Because rules can be modified without enacting a new statute.
What is the fourth reason for delegated legislation?	Emergency situations.
Why is delegated legislation important during emergencies?	Because it enables quick decision-making by authorities.
What examples of emergencies may require delegated legislation?	War, economic crisis and public health emergencies.
What is the fifth reason for delegated legislation?	Local variations.
Why are local variations important in delegated legislation?	Because different regions may require different regulatory measures.
How does delegated legislation address local conditions?	By allowing authorities to adapt rules according to local conditions.
What is the sixth reason for delegated legislation?	Experimental legislation.
How do administrative agencies use delegated legislation experimentally?	They can experiment with policies and modify them if necessary.
What is the overall conclusion regarding delegation of legislative power?	It has become indispensable in modern administrative states.

2.2 TYPES OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of the Types of Delegated Legislation?	It explains the classification of delegated legislation based on the nature of powers granted to administrative authorities.
On what basis have scholars classified types of delegated legislation?	On the basis of the nature of powers granted to administrative authorities.
What is an Enabling Act in delegated legislation?	A statute that confers power on administrative authorities to make rules, regulations or orders to implement the provisions of the Act.
What does the legislature provide in an Enabling Act?	The framework of the law.
Who frames the detailed rules under an Enabling Act?	The administrative authority.
What is the nature of delegation under an Enabling Act?	The statute merely enables the executive to exercise certain powers.
What type of matters may rules under an Enabling Act relate to?	Licensing procedures, qualifications, safety standards and regulatory requirements.
What does an Enabling Act provide for delegated legislation?	Authority and legal foundation.
What are Extension and Application Acts in delegated legislation?	Laws authorizing the executive to extend the operation of an existing statute to new territories or classes of persons with or without modifications.
What power is given to the executive under Extension and Application Acts?	The power to determine where and to whom the law should apply.
What example illustrates Extension and Application legislation?	Authorizing the government to extend a statute to newly formed states or territories.
What is the purpose of Extension and Application legislation?	To adapt laws to different geographical or administrative conditions.
What are Dispensing and Suspending Acts?	Delegations empowering the executive to exempt certain persons or areas from a statute or suspend the operation of a law under certain conditions.
What example illustrates Dispensing or Suspending legislation?	Government suspending certain regulations during emergencies or granting exemptions to industries.
Why are dispensing or suspending powers viewed with caution?	Because they may allow the executive to override or neutralize the operation of the law.
How do courts treat dispensing or suspending delegations?	Courts scrutinize such delegations carefully.
What are Alteration Acts in delegated legislation?	Delegations empowering the executive to modify or alter certain provisions of a statute for effective implementation.
What types of changes may be allowed under Alteration Acts?	Changing procedural provisions, modifying schedules or classifications and adjusting administrative details.
What limitation exists on alteration powers under delegated legislation?	The executive cannot alter the essential policy or fundamental structure of the statute.
What may excessive alteration by delegated authority amount to?	Excessive delegation.
What is Supplementary legislation?	Rules or regulations made by administrative authorities to supplement the provisions of a statute.
What is the purpose of Supplementary legislation?	To fill in the details necessary for effective implementation of the law.
What example illustrates Supplementary legislation?	Rules regarding licensing procedures, application formats and compliance requirements.
What role does Supplementary legislation play in the legislative scheme?	It completes the legislative scheme by providing operational details.
What are Taxing Acts in delegated legislation?	Delegations allowing administrative authorities to exercise limited taxation-related powers.
Who normally possesses the power to impose taxes?	The legislature.
What limited taxation powers may be delegated to administrative authorities?	Determining tax rates within limits, specifying assessment procedures and establishing tax collection mechanisms.
Under what condition is taxation delegation permissible?	When the legislature retains control over the essential elements of taxation.
What is Exceptional Delegation in delegated legislation?	A form of delegation allowing the executive to amend, modify or repeal statutory provisions.
What is another name for Exceptional Delegation?	Henry VIII Clause.
From where does the term Henry VIII Clause originate?	From English King Henry VIII known for exercising extensive legislative powers.
What powers may be granted under a Henry VIII Clause?	Power to amend statutes, repeal statutory provisions and legislate on matters of principle in some circumstances.
Why are Henry VIII clauses considered controversial?	Because they allow the executive to modify legislation enacted by the legislature.
How are Henry VIII clauses treated by courts and legislatures?	With great caution.
Under what condition are Henry VIII clauses permitted in modern constitutional systems?	Only under strict limitations and safeguards.
What is Sub-Delegated Legislation?	Delegation where a delegated authority further delegates its powers to another subordinate authority.
What example illustrates Sub-Delegation?	Parliament delegating rule-making power to a ministry which further authorizes a regulatory authority to frame regulations.
What Latin maxim governs the rule against sub-delegation?	Delegatus non potest delegare.
What does the maxim Delegatus non potest delegare mean?	A delegate cannot further delegate.
When may sub-delegation be permitted?	When the parent statute expressly authorizes it or when necessary for efficient administrative functioning.
What condition must be maintained even when sub-delegation is allowed?	The original authority must retain overall control and supervision.

2.3 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of the Constitutionality of Delegated Legislation?	It concerns the extent to which legislative powers can be delegated to administrative authorities.
What does the question of constitutionality of delegated legislation examine?	The extent to which legislative powers can be delegated to administrative authorities.
Is delegation of legislative power permitted in modern constitutional systems?	Yes, delegation of legislative power is permitted.
Can legislative power be delegated without limits in modern constitutional systems?	No, delegation of legislative power cannot be unlimited.
What must the legislature lay down while delegating legislative power?	The policy and guiding principles of the law.
What role do administrative authorities perform in delegated legislation?	They fill in the details of the law.
When is delegation of legislative power considered valid?	When the legislature retains its essential legislative function.

2.4 RE DELHI LAWS CASE
What is the subject matter of the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951)?	It concerns the constitutionality and limits of delegated legislation in India.
Why is the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951) considered important in administrative law?	Because it is the most important constitutional case on delegated legislation in India.
By what title is the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951) often referred to?	The “Bible of Delegated Legislation”.
What doctrinal development did the Supreme Court adopt in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951)?	The doctrine of excessive delegation.
What was the fundamental concern of the Supreme Court in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951)?	That delegated legislation should not make the executive or bureaucracy all-powerful.
Under which constitutional provision were questions referred to the Supreme Court in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	Article 143 of the Constitution.
What jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was invoked under Article 143 in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	Advisory jurisdiction.
Which three statutes were examined in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case (1951)?	Delhi Laws Act, 1912; Ajmer-Merwara (Extension of Laws) Act, 1947; and Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950.
What power was given to the executive under the statutes examined in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	The power to extend existing laws to certain territories with modifications.
What was the main constitutional question in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	To what extent the legislature can delegate its legislative powers to the executive.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding delegation of legislative power?	Delegation of legislative power is permissible but cannot be unlimited.
What important clarification did the Court make regarding delegated legislation?	Delegated legislation is not an inherent legislative power.
What is the nature of delegated legislation according to the Supreme Court?	It is an ancillary or subsidiary power.
To what extent is delegation allowed according to the Court?	Only to the extent necessary for implementing the law enacted by the legislature.
What must the legislature always retain according to the Supreme Court?	Its essential legislative function.
What functions were identified as essential legislative functions by the Court?	Determination of legislative policy and formulation of the rule of conduct.
What happens if essential legislative functions are transferred to the executive?	It amounts to excessive delegation and is unconstitutional.
What power regarding existing laws was held permissible for delegation?	The power to modify an existing law for adaptation or implementation.
Under what condition is modification of existing law permissible?	When it is only for the purpose of adaptation or implementation.
What distinction did the Supreme Court draw regarding delegated powers over laws?	Between modification of a law and amendment or repeal of a law.
What did the Court hold regarding the power to amend or repeal a law?	It is an essential legislative function.
Can the power to amend or repeal a law be delegated to the executive?	No, such delegation amounts to excessive delegation.
What was decided by the 5:2 majority in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	That Part 1 of Section 2 allowing modification of existing law for application was valid.
Why did the Court uphold Part 1 of Section 2 by a 5:2 majority?	Because such modification was ancillary to the implementation of the statute.
What was decided by the 4:3 majority in the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case?	That Part 2 of Section 2 allowing amendment or repeal of existing law was invalid.
Why did the Court invalidate Part 2 of Section 2 by a 4:3 majority?	Because the power to amend or repeal a statute is an essential legislative function.
What doctrine was firmly established in Indian administrative law by this case?	The doctrine of excessive delegation.
What constitutional validity did the case recognize regarding delegated legislation?	Delegated legislation is constitutionally valid in India.
What limitation did the Court impose on legislative delegation?	There cannot be unlimited delegation of legislative power.
What is the nature of delegated power according to the principles established in the case?	It is only ancillary or subsidiary.
What must the legislature retain under the doctrine established by the case?	Its essential legislative function.
What power did the Court declare non-delegable in the case?	The power to amend or repeal a statute.
Why is the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case considered the foundation of delegated legislation in India?	Because it established the doctrine of excessive delegation and limits on delegation.
What constitutional balance did the Court seek to maintain through this decision?	The balance between the legislature and the executive.
Why did the Supreme Court impose limits on delegation in this case?	To prevent concentration of excessive power in the executive.
Why is the In Re Delhi Laws Act Case regarded as the cornerstone of delegated legislation in India?	Because it laid down foundational principles governing legislative delegation.

2.5 WHAT IS AN ESSENTIAL LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION?
What is the subject matter of Essential Legislative Function?	It explains the core legislative responsibilities that cannot be delegated by the legislature.
What is meant by an essential legislative function?	The core legislative responsibility that cannot be delegated.
Who must determine the legislative policy of a law?	The legislature.
Who must lay down the guiding principles of a law?	The legislature.
What role can administrative authorities perform in delegated legislation?	They may fill in the details necessary for implementing the statute.
What happens if the legislature transfers its essential legislative function to another authority?	It amounts to excessive delegation.
What is the constitutional consequence of excessive delegation of essential legislative functions?	It would be unconstitutional.

2.6 ESSENTIAL LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION AND ITS TYPES
What is the subject matter of Essential Legislative Function and Its Types?	It explains the non-delegable core legislative functions and permissible forms of delegated powers.
According to which case is the doctrine of essential legislative function recognized in India?	In Re Delhi Laws Act (1951).
What is an essential legislative function according to the Supreme Court?	Determination of legislative policy and formulation of the rule of conduct.
Can the legislature delegate its essential legislative function?	No, it cannot delegate its essential legislative function.
What functions may be delegated by the legislature?	Ancillary or subsidiary functions necessary for implementing the law.
What is meant by the power of supplying details in delegated legislation?	The power given to administrative authorities to fill in details necessary for implementing the statute.
What type of legislation involves supplying details by the executive?	Skeleton legislation.
What is skeleton legislation?	A statute that lays down broad policy and framework while leaving details to be filled by administrative authorities.
Why is skeleton legislation considered valid?	Because the legislature retains essential legislative functions while the executive supplies operational details.
Which case upheld delegation involving supply of details under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946?	Harishankar Bagla v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1954).
What did the Supreme Court hold in Harishankar Bagla v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1954)?	That delegation to regulate essential commodities was valid since the Act laid down clear policy and purpose.
What constitutional principle was confirmed in Harishankar Bagla v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1954)?	Supplying details through delegated legislation is constitutionally valid.
What is meant by the power of inclusion and exclusion in delegated legislation?	Authority given to the executive to include or exclude certain areas, persons or subjects from the operation of a statute.
Under the power of inclusion and exclusion, what does the legislature determine?	The policy of the law.
What decision does the executive make under the power of inclusion and exclusion?	Where and to whom the law should apply.
When is inclusion or exclusion delegation considered valid?	When the statute provides sufficient guidance.
What is meant by the power of modification of a statute?	Authority given to administrative authorities to modify provisions of a statute for its application to specific areas or situations.
When is modification of a statute permissible under delegated legislation?	When it is merely adaptation or adjustment without altering the essential policy.
What happens if modification amounts to amendment or repeal of a statute?	It amounts to excessive delegation.
Which case established that amendment or repeal of a statute cannot be delegated?	In Re Delhi Laws Act (1951).
What is the abdication test in delegated legislation?	A test to determine whether the legislature has completely surrendered its legislative function to the executive.
When is delegation considered valid under the abdication test?	When the legislature retains control and the power to repeal the statute.
What happens if the legislature abandons its legislative responsibility?	It amounts to abdication and is unconstitutional.
Which case discussed a new test regarding constitutionality of delegated legislation involving abdication?	Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax.
Who proposed a new test regarding delegation in the Gwalior Rayon case?	Justice K.K. Mathew.
What was Justice K.K. Mathew’s test regarding legislative abdication?	If the legislature retains the power to repeal the enabling Act, it cannot be said to have abdicated its legislative function.
What implication did Justice Mathew’s test have for broad delegation?	Even very broad delegation could be valid if the legislature retains ultimate control.
Was Justice Mathew’s test accepted by the majority of the Court?	No, it was not accepted by the majority.
Which judge led the majority view rejecting Justice Mathew’s test?	Justice Khanna.
What principle did the majority reaffirm regarding delegated legislation?	The legislature must lay down policy and guidelines.
What happens if delegation occurs without clear policy or guidance?	It amounts to excessive delegation.
What test remained the primary standard for determining validity of delegated legislation?	The policy and guideline test.
In which case did Justice Mathew later apply his test regarding delegation?	N.K. Papiah case.
What principle did Justice Mathew emphasize in the N.K. Papiah case?	That legislative control through the power of repeal prevents abdication.
Which case indicated a relaxation of the strict policy and guideline test?	Registrar, Co-operative Societies v. K. Kunjabhu.
What provision was upheld in Registrar, Co-operative Societies v. K. Kunjabhu?	Power of the State Government to exempt any registered co-operative society from the operation of the Act.
What type of discretionary power did the Court effectively sanction in K. Kunjabhu?	A power resembling a Henry VIII type clause.
When can delegated legislation operate retrospectively?	When the parent statute expressly authorizes retrospective operation.
Which case upheld retrospective delegated legislation authorized by statute?	Darshan Lal Mehra v. Union of India.
What principle was upheld in Darshan Lal Mehra v. Union of India?	Delegated legislation may operate retrospectively if authorized by the parent statute.
Which recent case examined limits of delegated legislation affecting workers?	Kerala Samsthana Chethu Thozhilali Union v. State of Kerala (2006).
What principle did the Court reaffirm in Kerala Samsthana Chethu Thozhilali Union v. State of Kerala (2006)?	Delegated legislation must remain within the framework of the parent statute and must not violate constitutional principles.

2.7 IMPORTANCE OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of the Importance of Delegated Legislation in Administrative Law?	It explains the role and significance of delegated legislation in modern governance.
What role does delegated legislation play in modern governance?	It plays a crucial role in modern governance.
How does delegated legislation help governments in changing circumstances?	It enables governments to respond quickly to changing circumstances.
What does delegated legislation ensure regarding the implementation of laws?	Efficient implementation of laws.
Why must delegated legislation be subject to strict control?	Because it may affect the rights of individuals.
Through what mechanisms is delegated legislation controlled?	Legislative supervision and judicial review.
What role do courts play in controlling delegated legislation?	Courts ensure that delegated legislation does not exceed the authority granted by the parent statute.
What constitutional safeguard do courts enforce regarding delegated legislation?	That it does not violate constitutional principles.
What balance does delegated legislation represent in administrative law?	A balance between administrative efficiency and constitutional accountability.

CHAPTER-3
CONTROL OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of Control of Delegated Legislation?	It explains the mechanisms used to regulate and supervise delegated legislation.
Why has delegated legislation become an essential feature of modern governance?	Because legislatures cannot deal with every detail of administration.
What risk arises from delegated legislation?	Misuse or excessive concentration of power in administrative authorities.
Why is control over delegated legislation necessary?	To ensure that administrative authorities act within the limits prescribed by law.
Through how many major methods is control over delegated legislation generally exercised?	Three major methods.
What are the three major methods of controlling delegated legislation?	Parliamentary control, procedural control and judicial control.
What is parliamentary control over delegated legislation?	Legislative supervision exercised by Parliament over delegated legislation.
What is procedural control over delegated legislation?	Control exercised through procedural requirements prescribed in the parent statute.
What is judicial control over delegated legislation?	Control exercised by courts through judicial review.
What is the purpose of these control mechanisms over delegated legislation?	To ensure that delegated legislation does not violate constitutional principles.
What democratic objective do these mechanisms of control promote?	Accountability of delegated legislation to democratic institutions

3.1 PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of Parliamentary Control of Delegated Legislation?	It explains the legislative supervision exercised by Parliament over delegated legislation.
Why is parliamentary control considered the primary democratic safeguard over delegated legislation?	Because the legislature delegates law-making power to the executive and must ensure it is exercised properly.
What must the legislature ensure regarding delegated legislation?	That delegated powers are exercised properly and within the limits of the enabling statute.
Through which three mechanisms does Parliament mainly exercise control over delegated legislation?	Laying procedure, parliamentary debates and questions, and committee scrutiny.
What constitutional objective does parliamentary control protect?	The supremacy of the legislature.
How many major mechanisms exist for parliamentary control of delegated legislation in India?	Three mechanisms.
What are the three types of parliamentary control over delegated legislation in India?	Direct general control, direct special control and indirect control.
What is meant by direct general control over delegated legislation?	Control exercised through general parliamentary procedures.
Through which parliamentary procedures is direct general control exercised?	Question Hour, discussions and debates, motions and resolutions and budgetary control.
What is the role of Question Hour in controlling delegated legislation?	Members of Parliament may question administrative actions or delegated legislation.
How do parliamentary discussions and debates function as control over delegated legislation?	Members of Parliament may raise objections and examine administrative functioning.
What role do motions and resolutions play in controlling delegated legislation?	They allow Parliament to express disapproval or concern regarding administrative actions.
How does budgetary control act as a mechanism of parliamentary supervision?	Parliament can scrutinize administrative activities through financial control.
Why is this form of control called general control?	Because it examines administrative functioning as a whole rather than specific rules.
What is meant by direct special control over delegated legislation?	Specific scrutiny of delegated legislation through laying procedures.
What is the laying procedure in delegated legislation?	The requirement that rules and regulations framed by the executive be laid before Parliament.
What is the purpose of laying delegated legislation before Parliament?	To enable Parliament to examine, modify or annul the rules.
What powers does Parliament possess once delegated legislation is laid before it?	The power to examine, modify or annul the rules.
What type of supervision does laying procedure provide to Parliament?	Direct supervision over delegated legislation.
What is meant by indirect parliamentary control over delegated legislation?	Control exercised through parliamentary committees.
Which parliamentary committee primarily exercises indirect control over delegated legislation?	The Committee on Subordinate Legislation.
What does the Committee on Subordinate Legislation examine regarding delegated legislation?	Whether it is within the scope of the parent statute.
What does the Committee examine regarding the rule-making authority?	Whether the authority has exceeded its powers.
What unusual feature may the Committee investigate in delegated legislation?	Whether it involves unusual or unexpected use of power.
What happens if the Committee on Subordinate Legislation finds irregularities?	It reports the matter to Parliament.
What is the purpose of committee scrutiny in parliamentary control?	To ensure systematic examination of delegated legislation.
What issue arises regarding laying provisions in delegated legislation?	Whether laying before Parliament is mandatory or directory.
Which case is the leading authority on the legal consequences of non-compliance with laying provisions?	Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. v. State of Haryana.
What issue was examined by the Supreme Court in Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. v. State of Haryana?	The legal consequences of failure to lay rules before Parliament.
What question regarding laying provisions was considered in the Atlas Cycle case?	Whether the direction to lay rules before Parliament is mandatory or discretionary.
What second question regarding laying provisions was considered in the Atlas Cycle case?	Whether laying is a condition precedent for the operation of the rules.
What third question regarding laying provisions was considered in the Atlas Cycle case?	Whether failure to comply with the laying requirement invalidates the rules.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding non-compliance with laying provisions?	Its effect depends on the wording of the statute and circumstances of each case.
What principle did the Court emphasize regarding laying provisions?	No universal rule can determine whether they are mandatory or directory.
On what basis must courts determine the effect of non-compliance with laying provisions?	Legislative intent and statutory language.
What did the Atlas Cycle case clarify regarding invalidity of rules?	Non-compliance with laying provisions does not automatically invalidate rules.
What must courts examine when determining the effect of laying provisions?	The language and purpose of the statute.
Why is Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. v. State of Haryana considered significant?	It is the leading authority on the consequences of non-compliance with laying provisions.

3.2 PROCEDURAL CONTROL OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of Procedural Control of Delegated Legislation?	It explains procedural safeguards required while making delegated legislation.
What is meant by procedural control of delegated legislation?	The requirement that certain procedural safeguards must be followed in making delegated legislation.
What objectives do procedural safeguards in delegated legislation promote?	Transparency, fairness and accountability.
Through how many mechanisms does procedural control generally operate?	Two mechanisms.
What are the two mechanisms of procedural control of delegated legislation?	Publication and consultation.
What is the legal consequence of failure to follow mandatory procedural requirements?	Delegated legislation may be invalid as procedurally ultra vires.
What is meant by publication in delegated legislation?	Making delegated legislation known to the public through official publication.
Where is delegated legislation usually published?	In the Official Gazette.
Why is publication called post-natal publicity?	Because publicity is given after the rule or regulation is made.
What principle underlies the requirement of publication?	A person cannot be bound by a law unless it is properly made known to him.
What purpose does publication serve in delegated legislation?	It ensures citizens know the law regulating their conduct.
How does publication prevent arbitrary enforcement of law?	By preventing secret regulations.
Why is publication necessary for public awareness?	Citizens must know the laws governing their rights and obligations.
How does publication promote transparency in governance?	It prevents secret rule-making by administrative authorities.
How does publication promote fairness and natural justice?	Individuals should not be penalized for violating unknown rules.
What is the effect of publication on the legal validity of delegated legislation?	In many cases rules do not become operative until properly published.
Which case emphasized the importance of publication of delegated legislation?	Govindlal v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC).
What principle was established in Govindlal v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee?	Rules under delegated authority must be published in the manner prescribed by statute.
What happens if publication is not carried out as required by statute?	The delegated legislation may not become effective.
What essential condition for operation of delegated legislation was established in the Govindlal case?	Proper publication.
Which case reinforced the requirement of publication of delegated legislation affecting citizens' rights?	Sonic Industries v. Municipal Corporation, Ratlam.
What did the court hold in Sonic Industries v. Municipal Corporation, Ratlam?	Delegated legislation affecting citizens must be properly published.
What is the effect of unpublished or improperly published regulations?	They cannot be enforced against the public.
What is meant by consultation in procedural control of delegated legislation?	The requirement to consult specified persons or bodies before framing rules.
Who may be consulted before making delegated legislation?	Expert committees, advisory boards, professional organizations and stakeholder groups.
What is the purpose of consultation in delegated legislation?	To ensure rules are technically sound, practical and responsive to public interest.
What technical benefit does consultation provide in rule-making?	It ensures delegated legislation is technically sound.
How does consultation improve the practicality of delegated legislation?	By making rules workable and effective.
How does consultation promote responsiveness to public interest?	By involving relevant stakeholders in the rule-making process.
What determines the legal effect of consultation requirements?	Whether consultation is mandatory or directory.
What is mandatory consultation in delegated legislation?	Consultation required by statute before making rules.
What is the effect of failure to comply with mandatory consultation?	The delegated legislation may become invalid.
What is directory consultation in delegated legislation?	Consultation that is advisory and not compulsory.
What is the effect of failure to comply with directory consultation?	It may not invalidate the rules.
How do courts determine whether consultation is mandatory or directory?	By examining the language and intention of the statute.
What role do publication and consultation play in procedural control?	They ensure transparency, participation and accountability in rule-making.
How do procedural safeguards prevent misuse of delegated legislation?	By preventing arbitrary rule-making.
What democratic function does procedural control serve?	It protects citizens from unfair administrative actions.
Why is procedural control important in administrative law?	It maintains the legitimacy of delegated legislation in a democratic system.

C. JUDICIAL CONTROL OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
What is the subject matter of Judicial Control of Delegated Legislation?	It explains the control exercised by courts over delegated legislation through judicial review.
What is judicial control in delegated legislation?	The control exercised by courts to prevent misuse of delegated legislative powers.
Why is judicial control considered the most effective safeguard against misuse of delegated legislation?	Because courts review the legality and validity of delegated legislation.
Through what power do courts exercise judicial control over delegated legislation?	Through the power of judicial review.
From which principles does the power of judicial review arise?	The rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution.
What do courts ensure through judicial review of delegated legislation?	That it does not exceed statutory authority, violate constitutional provisions or involve arbitrary exercise of power.
What happens if delegated legislation exceeds the authority granted by law?	It is declared ultra vires.
What does the term ultra vires mean in delegated legislation?	Beyond the powers granted by law.
On how many grounds is judicial review of delegated legislation generally exercised?	Two grounds.
What are the two grounds of judicial review of delegated legislation?	Substantive ultra vires and procedural ultra vires.
What is meant by substantive ultra vires?	Invalidity of delegated legislation due to its content exceeding statutory authority or violating constitutional principles.
When is delegated legislation substantively ultra vires because of statutory limits?	When it exceeds the scope of authority granted by the enabling statute.
What rule must delegated legislation follow regarding the parent statute?	It must remain within the limits prescribed by the parent statute.
What is the consequence if delegated legislation exceeds statutory limits?	The rules become invalid.
When is delegated legislation invalid due to conflict with the parent statute?	When it contradicts or is inconsistent with the delegating statute.
Can delegated legislation override the statute under which it is made?	No, it cannot override the parent statute.
What constitutional requirement must delegated legislation satisfy?	It must comply with the Constitution of India.
Which constitutional rights must delegated legislation respect?	Fundamental rights.
When may delegated legislation be struck down under Article 14?	When it is arbitrary, unreasonable or discriminatory.
When may delegated legislation be invalid under Article 19?	When it imposes unreasonable restrictions on freedoms guaranteed under Article 19.
What is meant by manifest unreasonableness in delegated legislation?	A situation where delegated legislation is irrational or clearly unreasonable.
What is procedural ultra vires in delegated legislation?	Invalidity due to failure to follow mandatory procedures prescribed by the parent statute.
When does procedural ultra vires occur?	When mandatory procedural requirements for making delegated legislation are not followed.
What procedural safeguards are commonly required by parent statutes?	Publication of rules, consultation with authorities and laying before the legislature.
What is the effect of failure to publish rules in the Official Gazette?	Delegated legislation may become procedurally ultra vires.
What is the effect of failure to consult a required authority?	The delegated legislation may be declared invalid.
What is the effect of failure to comply with mandatory laying provisions?	Courts may invalidate the delegated legislation.
On which doctrine is judicial control of delegated legislation based?	The doctrine of rule of law.
What principle of governance does the rule of law require in administrative action?	Government authorities must act within the limits of law.
What type of governmental action is prohibited under the rule of law?	Arbitrary exercise of power.
What protection does judicial control provide to citizens?	Protection against misuse of administrative powers.
What constitutional role do courts perform through judicial review of delegated legislation?	Ensuring that delegated legislation does not undermine constitutional governance.

CHAPTER-4
ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION
4.1 DEFINITION AND MEANING
What is the subject matter of Meaning of Administrative Discretion?	It explains the concept of discretionary power exercised by administrative authorities.
What is meant by administrative discretion?	The power given to administrative authorities to choose between different courses of action while performing their duties.
Why does the legislature grant administrative discretion to authorities?	Because the legislature cannot specify every administrative detail in statutes.
What freedom does administrative discretion give to authorities?	Freedom to decide how a power should be exercised in particular circumstances.
What decision-making powers may administrative discretion involve?	Deciding whether to act, how to act and which factors to consider.
What does administrative discretion allow an authority to decide regarding action?	Whether to act or not.
What does administrative discretion allow an authority to decide regarding the manner of action?	How to act.
What does administrative discretion allow an authority to decide regarding relevant considerations?	Which factors should be considered.
Does administrative discretion mean arbitrary power?	No, discretion does not mean arbitrary power.
How must administrative discretion be exercised according to law?	Reasonably, fairly and within legal limits.
Which case explained the meaning of discretion in administrative law?	Sharp v. Wakefield.
Who explained the concept of discretion in Sharp v. Wakefield?	Lord Halsbury.
What principle regarding discretion was stated by Lord Halsbury?	Discretion must be exercised according to the rules of reason and justice and not according to private opinion.

4.2 NEED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION
What is the subject matter of the Need for Administrative Discretion?	It explains the reasons why discretionary powers are necessary in modern governance.
Why is administrative discretion necessary in modern governance?	Because modern administration requires flexibility in decision-making.
What is the first reason for the need for administrative discretion?	Complexity of modern administration.
Why cannot the legislature anticipate every situation in modern governance?	Because governments deal with complex social and economic problems.
What flexibility is required by administrative authorities in complex situations?	Flexibility to make decisions according to circumstances.
What is the second reason for administrative discretion?	Need for speed and efficiency.
Why do administrative decisions often require quick action?	Because governance may be delayed by strict legislative procedures.
How does administrative discretion improve administrative functioning?	It allows authorities to act promptly and efficiently.
What is the third reason for administrative discretion?	Technical expertise.
Why are administrative agencies better suited to decide certain matters?	Because they possess specialized knowledge and expertise.
What is the fourth reason for administrative discretion?	Practical implementation of laws.
What role does legislation usually perform in governance?	It lays down broad policies.
Who implements legislation in practical situations?	Administrative authorities.
Why is discretion required in implementing legislation?	Because authorities must apply broad policies to practical situations.

4.3 JUDICIAL BEHAVIOUR AND ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION
What is the subject matter of Judicial Behaviour and Administrative Discretion?	It explains the approach adopted by courts while reviewing administrative discretion.
What approach do courts generally adopt toward administrative discretion?	A balanced approach.
Why do courts recognize the necessity of administrative discretion?	Because it is necessary for efficient administration.
What do courts ensure while reviewing administrative discretion?	That discretion is not abused.
Through what mechanism do courts control administrative discretion?	Judicial review.
What types of administrative actions do courts seek to prevent through judicial review?	Arbitrary decisions, misuse of power and violation of constitutional rights.
What is the purpose of judicial review in relation to administrative discretion?	To ensure that authorities act within legal limits.
Do courts substitute their own opinion for that of administrative authorities during judicial review?	No, courts do not substitute their opinion.
What is the primary objective of judicial review of administrative discretion?	To ensure that administrative authorities act within the limits of law.

4.4 CONTROL AT THE STAGE OF DELEGATION OF DISCRETION
What is the subject matter of Control at the Stage of Delegation of Discretion?	It explains judicial control over delegation of discretionary powers to administrative authorities.
At which stage does the first control over administrative discretion occur?	At the stage when the legislature delegates discretionary powers.
What do courts examine regarding delegation of discretionary powers?	Whether such delegation violates constitutional principles.
Which constitutional provision governs equality in relation to administrative discretion?	Article 14 of the Constitution.
What does Article 14 of the Constitution guarantee?	Equality before law and equal protection of laws.
When may discretionary power violate Article 14?	When it is granted without policy, guideline or standard.
Why does absence of guidelines in discretionary powers violate Article 14?	Because it may lead to arbitrary exercise of power.
What do courts require in statutes conferring discretionary powers?	Clear policy and guiding principles.
Which fundamental right under the Constitution may be affected by administrative discretion?	Freedoms guaranteed under Article 19.
What freedoms are protected under Article 19 that may be affected by administrative discretion?	Freedom of speech, trade and movement.
When may a law granting discretionary power be declared unconstitutional under Article 19?	When it allows authorities to impose unreasonable restrictions on fundamental freedoms.
What constitutional limitation must discretionary powers follow?	They must be exercised reasonably and within constitutional limits.

4.5 CONTROL AT THE STAGE OF EXERCISE OF DISCRETION
What is the subject matter of Control at the Stage of Exercise of Discretion?	It explains judicial control over the actual exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities.
When do courts intervene in the exercise of administrative discretion?	When discretionary power is misused or abused.
What is meant by abuse of discretion?	Improper or unlawful exercise of discretionary power by an administrative authority.
What happens when administrative discretion is abused?	Courts may invalidate the administrative action.
What is meant by mala fides in administrative law?	Exercise of power with dishonest intention or improper motive.
When does mala fide exercise of power occur?	When authority acts for personal benefit, political pressure or ulterior motives.
What is the legal consequence if mala fides are proved?	Courts may invalidate the administrative action.
Why is proving mala fide exercise of power difficult?	Because it requires clear evidence of bad faith.
What principle governs the purpose for which administrative powers must be exercised?	Powers must be exercised only for the purpose for which they were granted.
What happens if administrative power is exercised for an improper purpose?	It constitutes abuse of discretion.
What happens if irrelevant considerations influence an administrative decision?	The decision becomes invalid.
What duty do administrative authorities have regarding relevant factors?	They must consider all relevant factors before making a decision.
What happens if relevant considerations are ignored by administrative authorities?	Courts may invalidate the decision.
What principle ensures that administrative decisions are fair and rational?	Consideration of relevant factors.
When can courts intervene due to unreasonable administrative decisions?	When decisions are so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would take them.
What principle governs unreasonable administrative decisions?	The Wednesbury principle of reasonableness.
What is the doctrine of promissory estoppel in administrative law?	The government may be prevented from going back on promises relied upon by individuals.
When does promissory estoppel apply?	When a person acts upon a promise or representation made by the authority.
What is the doctrine of legitimate expectation?	The expectation that a public authority will act consistently with its established policy or representations.
What purpose does the doctrine of legitimate expectation serve?	To ensure fairness in administrative decision-making.
Does legitimate expectation create an enforceable legal right?	No, it does not guarantee a legal right.
When may courts intervene under the doctrine of legitimate expectation?	When such expectation is arbitrarily defeated.
What is meant by subjective satisfaction in administrative law?	The authority must be personally satisfied that certain conditions exist before exercising power.
Can subjective satisfaction be reviewed by courts?	Yes, courts may examine the basis of such satisfaction.
What aspects of subjective satisfaction may courts review?	Whether it is based on relevant material and exercised in good faith.

4.6 NON-APPLICATION OF MIND
What is the subject matter of Non-Application of Mind in administrative law?	It explains invalid administrative action resulting from failure of authorities to properly apply their mind.
What is meant by non-application of mind in administrative decision-making?	Failure of an administrative authority to carefully consider the matter before making a decision.
What is the effect of non-application of mind on administrative action?	The administrative action becomes invalid.
What duty do administrative authorities have before making decisions?	They must apply their mind carefully to the facts and circumstances.
What is meant by acting under dictation in administrative law?	When an authority exercises power according to instructions or pressure from another authority.
What is the legal consequence of acting under dictation?	The decision becomes invalid.
What principle requires authorities to exercise independent judgment?	Administrative authorities must exercise their own discretion independently.
What is meant by imposing fetters on the exercise of discretion?	Adopting a rigid policy that prevents consideration of individual cases.
Can administrative authorities adopt policies for guidance?	Yes, policies may guide decision-making.
What limitation exists regarding administrative policies?	Authorities must remain open to exceptional circumstances.
What happens if an authority rigidly follows policy without considering individual facts?	It amounts to improper fettering of discretion.
What is meant by acting mechanically in administrative decision-making?	Making decisions routinely without careful consideration of facts.
What is the legal consequence of mechanical decision-making?	It amounts to non-application of mind and may invalidate the action.
What principle governs sub-delegation of discretionary powers?	Delegatus non potest delegare.
What does the maxim delegatus non potest delegare mean?	A delegate cannot further delegate powers.
When can sub-delegation of administrative power be valid?	When the parent statute expressly permits it.
What is the effect of unauthorized sub-delegation of power?	It may invalidate the administrative action.

4.7 DOCTRINE OF PROPORTIONALITY
What is the subject matter of the Doctrine of Proportionality?	It explains the principle used by courts to examine whether administrative action is excessive in relation to its objective.
What is the doctrine of proportionality in administrative law?	A principle of judicial review examining whether administrative action is excessive compared to the objective sought to be achieved.
What requirement does the doctrine of proportionality impose on administrative measures?	They must not be more drastic than necessary to achieve the objective.
What relationship must exist between means and ends under proportionality?	The means adopted must be proportionate to the ends sought to be achieved.
How many tests are generally involved in the doctrine of proportionality?	Two tests.
What are the two tests under the doctrine of proportionality?	Necessity test and balancing test.
What is examined under the necessity test in proportionality?	Whether the administrative action was necessary to achieve the objective.
When may administrative action fail the necessity test?	When a less restrictive or less severe measure could achieve the same objective.
What is the balancing test in proportionality?	A test balancing the importance of the objective and the impact of the action on individual rights.
What happens if the harm caused to individuals outweighs the benefit achieved by administrative action?	The action becomes invalid.
What type of scrutiny does proportionality allow courts to undertake?	Deeper and more intensive scrutiny of administrative decisions.
What aspects of administrative decisions can courts examine under proportionality?	Whether the decision was necessary, reasonable and within acceptable alternatives.
How does the doctrine of proportionality assist courts in reviewing administrative decisions?	By allowing comparison of variables and evaluation of the decision-maker’s justification.
Which traditional principle of judicial review is gradually being replaced by proportionality?	The Wednesbury test of unreasonableness.

4.8 WEDNUSBURY PRINCIPLE
What is the subject matter of the Wednesbury Principle?	It explains the standard of judicial review for examining unreasonableness in administrative decisions.
In which case was the Wednesbury principle laid down?	Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation (1948).
Who explained the scope of judicial review in the Wednesbury case?	Lord Greene.
What did Lord Greene state regarding judicial interference with administrative decisions?	Courts should not interfere unless certain conditions are satisfied.
When is judicial interference permissible under the Wednesbury principle?	When the decision is contrary to law.
When may courts interfere due to failure to consider relevant factors?	When relevant factors were not considered.
When may courts interfere due to irrelevant considerations?	When irrelevant factors were taken into account.
When may courts interfere on the ground of unreasonableness?	When the decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have taken it.
What is meant by Wednesbury unreasonableness?	A decision so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would have made it.
For how long was the Wednesbury test widely applied in administrative law?	For a long time in both England and India.
Which case expanded the grounds of judicial review in administrative law?	Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1983).
What is the common name of the Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service case?	The CCSU Case.
Who summarized the grounds of judicial review in the CCSU case?	Lord Diplock.
What three grounds of judicial review were identified by Lord Diplock in the CCSU case?	Illegality, procedural impropriety and irrationality.
What does irrationality represent in the CCSU case?	Another form of Wednesbury unreasonableness.
What future ground of judicial review did Lord Diplock mention in the CCSU case?	Proportionality.
Which case is the leading Indian authority on the doctrine of proportionality?	Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001).
What did the Supreme Court explain in Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001)?	The origin and application of the doctrine of proportionality.
Where did the doctrine of proportionality originate according to the Supreme Court?	In Prussia in the 19th century.
In which countries was the doctrine of proportionality later adopted?	Germany, France and other European countries.
Which international courts applied the doctrine of proportionality?	The European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.
What did the Supreme Court clarify regarding Wednesbury and proportionality in Om Kumar v. Union of India?	Their respective application in judicial review.
What test do courts generally apply in ordinary administrative matters according to Om Kumar?	The Wednesbury test.
When may courts apply the doctrine of proportionality according to Om Kumar?	When fundamental rights are involved.
What additional aspect of administrative law was discussed in Om Kumar v. Union of India?	Proportionality in relation to quantum of punishment in service law.
Which case summarized the law on judicial review of administrative discretion in India?	Union of India v. G. Ganayutham.
What principle did the Supreme Court reaffirm in Union of India v. G. Ganayutham?	The Wednesbury test as the normal standard of review.
What aspects do courts examine under the Wednesbury principle according to Ganayutham?	Whether the decision was illegal, procedurally improper or irrational.
What considerations do courts examine when reviewing administrative action?	Whether relevant factors were ignored or irrelevant factors were considered.
What additional ground of review may courts examine regarding administrative decisions?	Whether the decision was mala fide.
Do courts substitute their own decision for that of administrative authorities?	No, courts do not substitute their own decision.
What is the primary focus of judicial review of administrative decisions?	Legality and rationality rather than correctness of the decision.

4.9 CCSU PRINCIPLES
What is the subject matter of the CCSU Principles?	It explains the grounds of judicial review identified in the CCSU case.
In which case were the CCSU principles of judicial review formulated?	Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1983).
Who identified the grounds of judicial review in the CCSU case?	Lord Diplock.
How many grounds of judicial review were identified in the CCSU case?	Three.
What are the three grounds of judicial review under the CCSU principles?	Illegality, procedural impropriety and irrationality.
What is meant by illegality under the CCSU principles?	The authority acted beyond its legal powers.
What is meant by procedural impropriety under the CCSU principles?	Failure to follow the required procedure.
What is meant by irrationality under the CCSU principles?	A decision that is unreasonable under the Wednesbury principle.
Which traditional principle of administrative law is reflected in the ground of irrationality?	The Wednesbury principle of unreasonableness.
What future ground of judicial review was suggested by Lord Diplock in the CCSU case?	Proportionality.

4.10 COIMBATORE DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK CASE
What is the subject matter of the Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank Case?	It explains the recognition of the doctrine of proportionality in judicial review.
Which case recognized the growing importance of the doctrine of proportionality in India?	Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank v. Employees Association.
What observation did the Supreme Court make regarding proportionality in the Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank case?	That the doctrine of proportionality is gaining importance.
In what situations may the Wednesbury principle give way to proportionality review?	In cases involving fundamental rights or punishment in service law.
What type of scrutiny does proportionality allow in judicial review?	More intensive scrutiny of administrative decisions.

4.11 WEDNESBURY VS PROPORTIONALITY
What is the subject matter of Wednesbury vs Proportionality?	It explains the comparative standards of judicial review under the Wednesbury test and the doctrine of proportionality.
What type of judicial review is applied under the Wednesbury test?	Limited judicial review.
What type of scrutiny is applied under the doctrine of proportionality?	Deeper judicial scrutiny.
What does the court examine under the Wednesbury test?	Whether the decision is irrational.
What does the court examine under the doctrine of proportionality?	Whether the means adopted are proportionate to the ends.
When is a decision invalid under the Wednesbury test?	Only when it is extremely unreasonable.
When is a decision invalid under the doctrine of proportionality?	When the action is disproportionate to the objective.
How is the nature of judicial review under the Wednesbury test described?	Less intrusive.
How is the nature of judicial review under the doctrine of proportionality described?	More intrusive review.

4.12 Landmark Cases
1. Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?
What is the subject matter of Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?	It explains the judicial control of administrative discretion exercised for improper purposes.
What issue arose in Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?	The Minister refused to refer a complaint to an investigation committee.
What did the House of Lords hold regarding administrative discretion in Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?	Administrative discretion cannot be used to defeat the purpose of the statute.
What principle regarding statutory discretion was established in Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?	Discretion must be exercised to promote the policy and object of the Act.
When does administrative discretion become invalid according to Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture (1968)?	When it is exercised for an improper purpose.

2. S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India (1967)?
What is the subject matter of S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India (1967)?	It explains the requirement that administrative discretion must be guided by clear rules to prevent arbitrariness.
What principle of governance was emphasized by the Supreme Court in S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India (1967)?	The importance of the rule of law in administrative discretion.
What did the Court observe regarding absence of guidelines in exercising discretion?	It may lead to arbitrariness.
What requirement must exist while exercising administrative discretion according to S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India?	Clear rules and standards must guide the discretion.
What principle was established in S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India (1967)?	Administrative discretion must be guided by clear rules and standards to prevent arbitrary action.

3. Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1983)?
What is the subject matter of Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1983)?	It explains the classification of grounds of judicial review in administrative law.
What is the common name of Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1983)?	The CCSU Case.
Who classified the grounds of judicial review in the CCSU Case?	Lord Diplock.
How many grounds of judicial review were identified in the CCSU Case?	Three.
What are the three grounds of judicial review identified in the CCSU Case?	Illegality, procedural impropriety and irrationality.
What is meant by illegality as a ground of judicial review?	Acting beyond legal authority.
What is meant by procedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review?	Failure to follow required procedure.
What is meant by irrationality as a ground of judicial review?	A decision so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would take it.
What additional future ground of judicial review did Lord Diplock suggest in the CCSU Case?	Proportionality.

4. Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001)
What is the subject matter of Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001)?	It explains the doctrine of proportionality in Indian administrative law.
Which is the leading Indian case on the doctrine of proportionality?	Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001).
What issue was examined by the Supreme Court in Om Kumar v. Union of India?	The relationship between Wednesbury unreasonableness and proportionality.
What test is generally applied in ordinary administrative decisions according to Om Kumar v. Union of India?	The Wednesbury test.
When is the doctrine of proportionality applied according to Om Kumar v. Union of India?	When fundamental rights are involved.
What principle was established in Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001)?	Wednesbury applies in administrative matters while proportionality applies when fundamental rights are involved.

5. Union of India v. G. Ganayutham (1997)?
What issue was examined in Union of India v. G. Ganayutham (1997)?	The scope of proportionality and Wednesbury review in service law matters.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding judicial review in Union of India v. G. Ganayutham?	Courts normally apply the Wednesbury test unless fundamental rights are involved.

6. Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank v. Employees Association.
Which case recognized the growing importance of proportionality review in India?	Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank v. Employees Association.
What observation did the Court make regarding Wednesbury review in the Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank case?	Wednesbury review may sometimes give way to proportionality.

7. Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board (1967)
Which case dealt with subjective satisfaction of administrative authorities?	Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board (1967).
What principle was established in Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board?	Subjective satisfaction of authorities can be examined by courts.
What did the Court hold regarding phrases such as “in the opinion of the authority”?	Courts may examine whether the opinion was based on relevant material.

8. Rohtas Industries v. S.D. Agarwal (1969)
Which case examined whether administrative power was exercised without relevant evidence?	Rohtas Industries v. S.D. Agarwal (1969).
What principle was established in Rohtas Industries v. S.D. Agarwal?	Exercise of power without relevant evidence is invalid.

9. State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh (1980)
Which case dealt with mala fide exercise of administrative power?	State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh (1980).
What principle was established in State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh?	Exercise of discretionary power in bad faith is illegal.

10. Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979)
Which case established that administrative discretion must comply with Article 14?	Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979).
What principle was laid down in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority?	Administrative decisions must be fair, reasonable and non-arbitrary.

11. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Which landmark case expanded the scope of fairness in administrative action under Article 21?	Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978).
What principle regarding administrative procedure was established in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Administrative decisions affecting personal liberty must follow fair procedure under Article 21.

CHAPTER-5
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE
5.1 Meaning and concept of natural justice
What is the subject matter of the Meaning and Concept of Natural Justice?	It explains the basic principles ensuring fairness in decision-making.
What are the principles of natural justice?	Fundamental rules ensuring fairness in decision-making.
To which types of actions do the principles of natural justice apply?	Judicial, quasi-judicial and administrative actions.
Is natural justice a codified law?	No, it is not a codified law.
How have the principles of natural justice developed?	As procedural principles developed by courts to prevent injustice.
What is the main objective of natural justice?	To ensure that administrative authorities act fairly, reasonably and without bias.
On what fundamental idea are the principles of natural justice based?	Justice must not only be done but must also appear to be done.

5.2 Need for administrative adjudication
What is the subject matter of the Need for Administrative Adjudication?	It explains the necessity of administrative adjudication in modern governance.
Why do many disputes arise in administrative fields?	Because modern governments perform numerous regulatory and welfare functions.
In which areas do administrative disputes commonly arise?	Taxation, licensing, labour relations and regulatory control.
Why cannot traditional courts handle all administrative disputes efficiently?	Because of the large number and complexity of such disputes.
Who is entrusted with adjudicatory functions in administrative matters?	Administrative authorities and tribunals.
What is administrative adjudication?	The process by which administrative authorities and tribunals decide disputes.
What advantage does administrative adjudication provide regarding dispute resolution?	Speedy resolution of disputes.
How does administrative adjudication benefit from expertise?	It uses specialized expertise of administrative authorities.
How does administrative adjudication help the judicial system?	By reducing the burden on ordinary courts.
Why must administrative authorities follow fair procedures in adjudication?	Because they exercise adjudicatory powers affecting rights of individuals.
Through what principles is fairness ensured in administrative adjudication?	The principles of natural justice.

5.3 problem with administrative adjudication
What is the subject matter of the Problems of Administrative Adjudication?	It explains the concerns and limitations associated with administrative adjudication.
What concern arises because administrative authorities combine multiple functions?	It may threaten impartiality.
Which functions are often combined by administrative authorities?	Executive, legislative and adjudicatory functions.
What procedural deficiency may exist in administrative adjudication?	Lack of procedural safeguards.
What institutional concern may affect administrative authorities?	Lack of independence from government influence.
What transparency issue may arise in administrative adjudication?	Lack of transparency in decision-making.
Why are safeguards necessary in administrative adjudication?	Because administrative authorities exercise significant powers affecting rights.
What principles act as safeguards against misuse of administrative powers?	The principles of natural justice.

5.4 landmark case on natural justice
What is the subject matter of Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy?	It explains the concept, scope and importance of the principles of natural justice.
Which case elaborately explained the concept of natural justice in Indian administrative law?	Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy.
What did the Supreme Court state regarding the nature of natural justice in Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy?	Natural justice is another name for common sense justice.
Are the rules of natural justice codified according to Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy?	No, they are not codified rules.
What is the purpose of the rules of natural justice according to the Court?	To ensure fairness in decision-making.
How are the principles of natural justice described in relation to human conscience?	They are deeply ingrained in the conscience of human beings.
What objective do natural justice and legal justice share according to the Court?	Securing justice.
Do natural justice and legal justice form a watertight classification?	No, they do not form a watertight classification.
What role does natural justice play when legal justice fails to ensure fairness?	It supplements legal justice.
How does natural justice function in relation to strict legal rules?	As a corrective mechanism to ensure fairness.
How has the concept of natural justice evolved over time according to the Court?	Its scope has expanded in modern administrative law.
To which types of actions was natural justice traditionally applied?	Judicial or quasi-judicial actions.
To which additional actions does natural justice now apply?	Administrative actions affecting rights of individuals.
Must the rules of natural justice always be expressly stated in statutes?	No, they may be implied from the nature of the duty under a statute.
What happens when a statute is silent regarding procedural fairness?	Courts may read the principles of natural justice into administrative action.
What traditional distinction has largely disappeared according to the Court?	The distinction between judicial acts and administrative acts.
Which Latin maxim related to audi alteram partem was referred to in the case?	Qui aliquid statuerit parte inaudita altera, aequum licet dixerit, haud aequum fecerit.
What is the meaning of the maxim quoted in Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy?	One who decides without hearing the other side, even if correct, has not done justice.
What principle of natural justice is reinforced by this maxim?	Audi alteram partem.
What broader doctrine is supported by the rule of audi alteram partem?	Justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done.
What procedural value does the rule of audi alteram partem ensure?	Procedural fairness.

5.5 rule against bias
What is the subject matter of the Rules of Natural Justice?	It explains the fundamental rules forming the principles of natural justice.
Through how many traditional rules are the principles of natural justice expressed?	Two fundamental rules.
What is the first rule of natural justice?	Nemo judex in causa sua.
What does nemo judex in causa sua mean?	No person shall be a judge in his own cause.
What is the second rule of natural justice?	Audi alteram partem.
What does audi alteram partem mean?	Hear the other side.
What is the third modern principle of natural justice?	Reasoned decisions or speaking orders.
What is the subject matter of the Rule Against Bias under natural justice?	It explains the requirement of impartiality in decision-making.
Which maxim expresses the rule against bias?	Nemo judex in causa sua.
What does the maxim nemo judex in causa sua mean?	No one should be a judge in his own cause.
What principle of natural justice is reflected in the rule against bias?	Impartiality in decision-making.
What must a person deciding a case be free from under the rule against bias?	Prejudice, personal interest and influence.
What is the effect of bias on a decision?	The decision becomes invalid and void.
What is meant by coram non judice?	A matter decided by a person not competent to decide it.
When are proceedings treated as coram non judice?	When the decision is influenced by bias

5.6 two essential aspects of rule against bias
What is the subject matter of the Two Essential Aspects of the Rule Against Bias?	It explains the fundamental requirements ensuring impartiality in decision-making.
What are the two essential aspects of the rule against bias?	Absence of personal interest and real likelihood of bias.
What is meant by absence of personal interest in the rule against bias?	The decision-maker must not have any direct personal, financial or proprietary interest in the outcome.
What type of interest must an adjudicating authority avoid under the rule against bias?	Personal, financial or proprietary interest.
What is meant by real likelihood of bias?	A situation where there is reasonable apprehension that the decision-maker may be biased.
Is proof of actual bias necessary to invalidate a decision?	No, a real likelihood or reasonable apprehension of bias is sufficient.
What principle supports the rule against bias regarding fairness?	Justice must not only be done but must also appear to be done.
What is pecuniary bias?	Bias arising when the decision-maker has a financial interest in the outcome of the case.
What is the judicial approach toward pecuniary bias?	Any financial interest, however small, invalidates the decision.
Why does financial interest invalidate a decision under pecuniary bias?	Because financial gain directly affects impartiality.
What is personal bias?	Bias arising from personal relationship or hostility toward one of the parties.
What relationships may lead to personal bias?	Friendship, family relationship, professional or business association.
What emotional factor may also create personal bias?	Personal animosity or hostility.
What effect do such personal relationships create in adjudication?	A reasonable apprehension of partiality.
What is subject-matter bias?	Bias arising when the decision-maker has prior involvement with the subject matter of the dispute.
Why may subject-matter bias occur?	Because the authority may have already formed opinions on the issue.
Does mere prior involvement automatically invalidate a decision?	No, unless there is a real likelihood of bias.
When does subject-matter involvement invalidate a decision?	When the authority has identified himself too closely with the issues in dispute.

5.7 burden of proof in bias and mala fides
What is the subject matter of Burden of Proof in Bias and Mala Fides?	It explains the distinction between bias and mala fides as forms of abuse of administrative power.
How are bias and mala fides treated in administrative law?	Both are considered abuse of administrative power.
Do bias and mala fides have the same nature in administrative law?	No, they differ in nature.
What is meant by mala fides?	Dishonest intention or bad faith.
What does mala fide exercise of power involve?	Exercising power with improper motives or ulterior purposes.
What is meant by bias in administrative law?	Prejudice or predisposition affecting impartial decision-making.
What effect does bias have on decision-making?	It prevents a fair and impartial decision.

5.8 burden of proof
What is the subject matter of Burden of Proof in Bias and Mala Fides?	It explains the evidentiary requirements for proving mala fides and bias in administrative law.
On whom does the burden of proving mala fides lie?	On the person who alleges mala fides.
How heavy is the burden of proof in cases alleging mala fides?	It is very heavy.
Are mere allegations sufficient to prove mala fides?	No, mere allegations are not sufficient.
What must the party alleging mala fides produce?	Specific materials and evidence.
How must mala fides be established before courts?	Clearly from facts and circumstances.
What observation have courts repeatedly made regarding allegations of mala fides?	They are easily made but difficult to prove.
What degree of proof is required for allegations of mala fides?	A high degree of credibility and proof.
How do courts treat allegations of mala fides based on incomplete facts?	Courts are slow to draw such conclusions.
What statement is often used regarding mala fides in litigation?	Mala fides is the last refuge of a losing litigant.
Is proof of actual prejudice necessary to establish bias?	No, it is not necessary.
What must be shown to establish bias?	Real likelihood or reasonable apprehension of bias.
What type of likelihood of bias is required for judicial intervention?	Real and substantial likelihood.
Are speculative or imaginary apprehensions sufficient to prove bias?	No, they are not sufficient.
Which famous case dealt with bias involving judicial interest in a cause?	R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Pinochet Ugarte.
What principle was reaffirmed in the Pinochet case?	No one should be a judge in his own cause.
What did the House of Lords hold regarding judicial disqualification in the Pinochet case?	A judge must be disqualified if he has interest in promoting a cause connected with a party.
Does the rule against bias apply only to financial interests according to the Pinochet case?	No, it also applies where the judge promotes a cause with which he is associated.
Which Indian case clarified the concept of bias in administrative law?	G.S. Nayak v. Goa University.
What did the Supreme Court hold in G.S. Nayak v. Goa University regarding bias?	Not every kind of bias invalidates administrative action.
What type of bias invalidates administrative action according to the Court?	Unreasonable prejudice motivated by self-interest.
What standard of bias must be proved according to G.S. Nayak v. Goa University?	Bias must be substantial and real, not hypothetical.

5.9 Burden of Proof in Bias / Mala Fides
What is the subject matter of Burden of Proof in Bias / Mala Fides and Rule of Fair Hearing?	It explains the evidentiary burden in bias or mala fides and the principle of audi alteram partem in natural justice.
On whom lies the burden of proving bias or mala fide intention?	On the person alleging it.
Why do courts recognize difficulty in proving bias?	Because bias is often difficult to prove directly.
What standard of proof may be sufficient to invalidate a decision based on bias?	Reasonable likelihood of bias.
What is the second fundamental rule of natural justice?	Audi alteram partem.
What does the maxim audi alteram partem mean?	No person should be condemned without being given an opportunity to be heard.
What does the rule of fair hearing ensure in administrative decisions?	A fair opportunity for affected persons to present their case.
When does the rule of audi alteram partem apply?	When administrative decisions affect the rights or interests of individuals.
What is the first component of the rule of fair hearing?	Right to notice.
What must be given to the affected person before proceedings begin?	Proper notice of the proceedings.
What must a valid notice specify in administrative proceedings?	Charges or allegations, time and place of hearing, and authority conducting the inquiry.
Why is proper notice necessary for natural justice?	Because without notice a fair hearing is impossible.
What is the second component of the rule of fair hearing?	Right to present case and evidence.
What opportunities must be given to the affected person under this right?	To present arguments, produce documents and submit evidence.
Why is the right to present evidence important in administrative proceedings?	To ensure that the authority considers all relevant facts.
What is the third component of the rule of fair hearing?	Right to rebut adverse evidence.
What opportunity must be given to challenge adverse evidence?	Cross-examining witnesses and presenting counter-evidence.
What is cross-examination in administrative proceedings?	The opportunity to test the credibility of witnesses and evidence.
Is cross-examination always mandatory in administrative proceedings?	No, it is not always mandatory.
When may cross-examination become necessary in administrative proceedings?	When serious allegations are involved.
What is meant by legal representation in administrative proceedings?	Representation through lawyers or legal advisers.
Is legal representation always a fundamental right in administrative proceedings?	No, it is not always a fundamental right.
When may legal representation be allowed in administrative proceedings?	When cases involve complex legal issues or the opposing side has legal counsel.
What additional factor may justify legal representation in administrative proceedings?	When fairness requires legal assistance.

5.10 THIRD NATURAL JUSTICE
What is the subject matter of the Third Principle of Natural Justice?	It explains the requirement that administrative authorities must give reasoned decisions.
What is the third modern principle of natural justice?	Reasoned decisions or speaking orders.
What is meant by a speaking order?	An order in which the authority records reasons for its decision.
Why are reasoned decisions considered a principle of natural justice?	Because they ensure fairness, transparency and accountability in decision-making.
What is the primary requirement of a reasoned decision?	The authority must record the reasons for its conclusion.
How do speaking orders promote transparency in administration?	By revealing the basis on which the decision was made.
How do reasoned decisions facilitate judicial review?	They enable courts to examine the legality and reasoning of the decision.
How do speaking orders prevent arbitrary administrative action?	By requiring authorities to justify their decisions with reasons.
What does recording reasons demonstrate about administrative authorities?	That the authority has applied its mind to the issues.
Which case recognized the importance of recording reasons as part of natural justice?	S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India (1990).
What principle did the Supreme Court establish in S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India?	Recording reasons is an essential requirement of administrative decisions.
What is the overall objective of the principle of reasoned decisions?	To ensure fairness and accountability in administrative decision-making.

5.11 LANDMARK JUDGMENTS
What is the subject matter of A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	It explains the expansion of the scope of natural justice in administrative actions.
What principle of administrative law was expanded in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	The scope of natural justice.
What important observation did the Supreme Court make regarding administrative and quasi-judicial functions in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	The distinction between administrative and quasi-judicial functions has become thin.
When do the principles of natural justice apply according to A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	Whenever administrative decisions affect the rights of individuals.
What issue of natural justice was involved in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	Bias in decision-making.
What was the conflict of interest in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	A member of the selection committee was himself a candidate.
Which rule of natural justice was violated in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	The rule against bias.
What principle regarding administrative actions was established in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India?	Natural justice applies to administrative actions.
Did A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India develop the doctrine of post-decisional hearing?	No, it did not specifically develop that doctrine.
What is the subject matter of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	It explains the application of natural justice and the concept of post-decisional hearing under Article 21.
What action of the government was challenged in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Impounding of Maneka Gandhi’s passport without prior hearing.
Under which constitutional provision was the action challenged in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Article 21 of the Constitution.
What principle regarding procedure affecting personal liberty was laid down in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	The procedure must be fair, just and reasonable.
What type of hearing is normally required according to Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Prior hearing.
When may post-decisional hearing be permitted according to Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	In urgent or exceptional situations.
What doctrine was recognized by the Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Post-decisional hearing.
What constitutional principle regarding natural justice was affirmed in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	Natural justice forms part of fair procedure under Article 21.
What effect can post-decisional hearing have according to Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?	It may cure the absence of prior hearing in urgent cases.

CHAPTER-6
JUDICIAL REVIEW WRITS
What is the subject matter of the Meaning of Judicial Review?	It explains the power of courts to examine the legality of actions of public authorities.
What is judicial review?	The power of courts to examine the legality of actions of administrative, legislative and executive authorities.
Whose actions can be examined under judicial review?	Administrative authorities, legislative bodies and executive authorities.
What is the purpose of judicial review?	To ensure that public authorities act within the limits of law and the Constitution.
When can courts invalidate an administrative or governmental action?	When it is unconstitutional, ultra vires, arbitrary or unreasonable.
What does the term ultra vires mean in judicial review?	Beyond the authority granted by law.
What happens if a governmental action is found unconstitutional in judicial review?	The courts may invalidate such action.
What constitutional status does judicial review have in India?	It is a basic feature of the Constitution of India.

6.1 APPEALS VS JUDICIAL REVIEW
What is the subject matter of Appeal and Judicial Review Distinguished?	It explains the difference between appeal and judicial review.
Do appeal and judicial review both involve court scrutiny of decisions?	Yes, both involve scrutiny by courts.
What does an appellate court examine in an appeal?	The correctness of the decision.
What does a court examine in judicial review?	The legality of the decision.
Can an appellate authority substitute its own decision in an appeal?	Yes, it may substitute its own decision.
Does a court normally substitute its own decision in judicial review?	No, it normally does not substitute its decision.
What is the focus of an appeal?	The merits of the case.
What is the focus of judicial review?	Procedure and legality.
Is judicial review concerned with the merits of administrative decisions?	No, it is concerned with whether the decision was taken lawfully and fairly.

6.2 POWERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURTS
What is the subject matter of the Powers of Judicial Review of Supreme Court and High Courts?	It explains the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and High Courts under the Constitution of India.
Which courts are granted judicial review powers under the Constitution of India?	The Supreme Court and the High Courts.
Under which Article does the Supreme Court exercise writ jurisdiction?	Article 32 of the Constitution.
For what purpose can the Supreme Court issue writs under Article 32?	For enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
Who described Article 32 as the “heart and soul of the Constitution”?	Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
Under which Article do High Courts exercise writ jurisdiction?	Article 226 of the Constitution.
What type of powers do High Courts have under Article 226?	Power to issue writs.
For what rights can High Courts issue writs under Article 226?	For enforcement of Fundamental Rights and any other legal right.
Which court has wider writ jurisdiction in India?	High Courts.
Why is Article 226 considered broader than Article 32?	Because it allows writs for both fundamental rights and other legal rights.
What power is granted to High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution?	The power to issue writs.
For what purposes can High Courts issue writs under Article 226?	For enforcement of fundamental rights and other legal rights.
What power is granted to High Courts under Article 227 of the Constitution?	Supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate courts and tribunals.
What is the purpose of Article 227 of the Constitution?	To enable High Courts to supervise subordinate courts and tribunals.
What is the combined objective of Articles 226 and 227?	To ensure effective judicial control over administrative authorities.

6.3 OUSTER CLAUSES (FINALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION)
What is the subject matter of Ouster Clauses (Finality of Administrative Action)?	It explains statutory provisions attempting to exclude judicial review of administrative decisions.
What are ouster clauses in administrative law?	Statutory provisions attempting to exclude the jurisdiction of courts over administrative decisions.
What do ouster clauses usually declare regarding administrative decisions?	That such decisions are final.
How do courts interpret ouster clauses?	Strictly.
Can ouster clauses completely bar judicial review?	No, they cannot completely eliminate judicial review.
When may courts still exercise judicial review despite an ouster clause?	When the authority acted without jurisdiction.
When may courts intervene despite finality clauses regarding natural justice?	When there is violation of natural justice.
When may courts review administrative action despite ouster clauses regarding legality?	When the action is ultra vires.
What principle is reinforced by judicial approach to ouster clauses?	Judicial review cannot be completely excluded.

6.4 LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
What is the subject matter of Limits of Judicial Review?	It explains the restrictions developed by courts to prevent excessive interference with administrative functioning.
Why have courts developed limitations on judicial review?	To prevent excessive interference with administrative functioning.
What is meant by locus standi in judicial review?	The right of a person to bring a case before a court.
Who could traditionally approach the court under the doctrine of locus standi?	Only a person whose legal rights were directly affected.
How has the doctrine of locus standi been relaxed in modern law?	Through the development of Public Interest Litigation.
In what situations has locus standi been relaxed through PIL?	Cases involving public interest and fundamental rights.
What is the principle of res judicata?	A matter finally decided by a competent court cannot be litigated again.
What is the purpose of the doctrine of res judicata?	To ensure finality and stability of judicial decisions.
What does the doctrine of laches refer to?	Refusal of relief when a petitioner approaches the court after unreasonable delay.
What principle forms the basis of the doctrine of laches?	Equity aids the vigilant and not those who sleep on their rights.
What may happen if a person delays seeking judicial relief?	The person may lose the right to judicial review.
What is meant by exhaustion of alternative remedies?	The requirement to use statutory remedies before approaching the court.
What must a petitioner normally do before filing a writ petition?	Exhaust all available alternative remedies.
What examples of alternative remedies may exist under statutes?	Appeal or revision mechanisms.
When may courts entertain writ petitions despite alternative remedies?	When there is violation of fundamental rights.
When may courts entertain writ petitions despite alternative remedies regarding jurisdiction?	When the authority lacks jurisdiction.
When may courts entertain writ petitions despite alternative remedies regarding procedure?	When there is violation of natural justice.

6.5 JUDICIAL WRITS
What is the subject matter of Constitutional Writs?	It explains the writ powers exercised by courts for judicial review.
How many constitutional writs can Indian courts issue for judicial review?	Five writs.
From where were the constitutional writs originally derived?	English common law.
What are the five constitutional writs issued by Indian courts?	Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus, Habeas Corpus and Quo Warranto.
What is the writ of certiorari?	A writ issued by a higher court to quash the order of a lower court or tribunal acting without jurisdiction or committing an error of law.
What is the main purpose of the writ of certiorari?	To correct jurisdictional errors and illegal decisions.
When may a writ of certiorari be issued due to lack of authority?	When the authority acted without jurisdiction.
When may certiorari be issued due to jurisdictional excess?	When the authority exceeded its jurisdiction.
When may certiorari be issued due to legal error?	When there is an error of law apparent on the face of the record.
When may certiorari be issued regarding procedural fairness?	When principles of natural justice are violated.
What is meant by error of law apparent on the face of the record?	A clear legal mistake visible from the record itself.
Does error of law apparent require detailed examination of evidence?	No, it is visible from the record without detailed examination.
What are jurisdictional facts in relation to certiorari?	Facts on which the authority’s jurisdiction depends.
When may courts review jurisdictional facts while issuing certiorari?	When the existence of such facts determines the authority’s jurisdiction.
Do courts generally interfere with findings of fact by administrative authorities?	No, courts generally do not interfere with findings of fact.
When may courts interfere with findings of fact?	When findings are based on no evidence.
When may courts interfere with findings of fact due to irrationality?	When findings are perverse or unreasonable.
What is the writ of prohibition?	A writ issued by a higher court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from acting beyond its jurisdiction.
At what stage is prohibition issued compared to certiorari?	Before the decision is made.
What is the key difference between certiorari and prohibition?	Certiorari quashes a decision already made while prohibition prevents proceedings beyond jurisdiction.
What is the writ of mandamus?	A writ directing a public authority to perform a public duty it has failed or refused to perform.
What does the term mandamus mean?	We command.
What condition must exist for issuing mandamus regarding duty?	A legal duty must be imposed on the authority.
What failure must occur before mandamus is issued?	Failure or refusal to perform the public duty.
What right must the petitioner possess for mandamus to be issued?	A legal right to demand performance of the duty.
Against whom will mandamus not issue regarding constitutional authorities?	The President or Governors.
Against whom will mandamus not issue in private capacity?	Private individuals unless performing public duty.
Against whom will mandamus not issue regarding legislative powers?	Legislative bodies performing legislative functions.
What is the writ of habeas corpus?	A writ issued to produce a detained person before the court to examine the legality of detention.
What does the term habeas corpus mean?	Produce the body.
What right does the writ of habeas corpus protect?	Personal liberty.
When is habeas corpus issued?	When a person is illegally detained.
What is the writ of quo warranto?	A writ challenging the legality of a person’s claim to a public office.
What does quo warranto mean?	By what authority.
What may the court do if an appointment to public office is illegal under quo warranto?	Remove the person from office.
What is a curative petition?	An extraordinary remedy available in the Supreme Court after dismissal of a review petition.
What is the purpose of a curative petition?	To prevent miscarriage of justice in exceptional cases.
When will the Supreme Court entertain a curative petition?	When there is gross violation of natural justice or fundamental rights.

6.6 LANDMARK JUDGMENT ON WRITS
What is the subject matter of Landmark Judgments on Judicial Review and Writs?	It explains important Supreme Court decisions relating to judicial review and constitutional writs.
Which case is considered the most important case on judicial review in India?	Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala.
What principle was established in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala regarding judicial review?	Judicial review is part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.
Can judicial review be removed by constitutional amendment according to Kesavananda Bharati?	No, it cannot be removed.
Which case held that judicial review powers of High Courts and the Supreme Court form part of the basic structure?	L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.
What did the Court decide regarding tribunals in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Tribunals cannot completely replace the jurisdiction of High Courts.
What principle regarding writ jurisdiction was affirmed in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Judicial review under Articles 226 and 32 cannot be excluded.
Which case reaffirmed that limited government and judicial review are basic features of the Constitution?	Minerva Mills v. Union of India.
What constitutional balance was emphasized in Minerva Mills v. Union of India?	Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
Which case dealt with the writ of certiorari in relation to jurisdictional errors?	State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh.
When may certiorari be issued according to State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh?	When there is a clear error of law or violation of natural justice.
Which case explained the nature and scope of the writ of certiorari?	T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa.
When may certiorari be issued according to T.C. Basappa v. T. Nagappa?	When the tribunal acts without jurisdiction, exceeds jurisdiction or commits error of law.
Which case explained the concept of error of law apparent on the face of the record?	Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque.
What principle regarding certiorari was laid down in Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque?	Certiorari may be issued when a clear legal error appears on the record.
Which case clarified the scope of the writ of mandamus?	Rashid Ahmed v. Municipal Board Kairana.
When may mandamus be issued according to Rashid Ahmed v. Municipal Board Kairana?	When a public authority fails to perform a statutory duty.
Which case held that mandamus normally cannot be issued against private bodies?	Praga Tools Corporation v. C.V. Imanual.
When may mandamus be issued against a private body according to Praga Tools Corporation v. C.V. Imanual?	When the body performs a public duty.
Which case dealt with the writ of habeas corpus during the Emergency?	ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla.
What did the majority hold in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla?	Habeas corpus could not be invoked during the Emergency.
What is the later status of the decision in ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla?	It was strongly criticized and effectively overruled.
Which case expanded the scope of personal liberty under Article 21 and strengthened judicial review?	Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India.
Which case explained the writ of quo warranto?	University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao.
When may quo warranto be issued according to University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao?	When a person illegally occupies a public office.
Which case discussed the relationship between Articles 226 and 227?	Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai.
What issue regarding High Court powers was discussed in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai?	The supervisory jurisdiction of High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
In which case did the Supreme Court evolve the concept of curative petition?	Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra.
Why did the Supreme Court evolve the remedy of curative petition?	To prevent miscarriage of justice in exceptional circumstances.
What inherent power of the Supreme Court was recognized in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra?	The power to reconsider its own judgment in exceptional cases.
What is a curative petition?	An extraordinary judicial remedy available after dismissal of a review petition.
When can a curative petition be filed?	After the dismissal of a review petition by the Supreme Court.
What is the main objective of a curative petition?	To prevent miscarriage of justice.
What type of errors may be corrected through a curative petition?	Gross procedural errors in the Supreme Court’s own judgment.

CHAPTER-7
TRIBUNALS AND REGULATORY BODIES
7.1 Meaning and Definition of Tribunals
What is the subject matter of the Meaning and Definition of Tribunals?	It explains the concept and nature of tribunals in administrative law.
What is a tribunal?	A quasi-judicial body established by statute to adjudicate disputes in specialized areas of law.
For what purpose are tribunals created?	To provide speedy, specialized and less formal justice.
Why are tribunals particularly suitable for certain disputes?	Because such disputes require technical expertise.
What type of powers do tribunals exercise?	Judicial or quasi-judicial powers.
Are tribunals part of the ordinary hierarchy of courts?	No, they are not part of the ordinary hierarchy of courts.
Which case explained the essential characteristics of a tribunal?	Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma.
What must a tribunal possess according to Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma?	Judicial powers of the State.
What authority must a tribunal have according to the Supreme Court?	Authority to adjudicate disputes.
What duty must a tribunal perform while deciding cases?	The duty to act judicially.

7.2 TRIBUNAL DISTINGUISHED FROM COURT
What is the subject matter of Tribunal Distinguished from Court?	It explains the differences between courts and tribunals.
Are tribunals and courts both adjudicatory bodies?	Yes, both perform adjudicatory functions.
Under what authority are courts created?	Under the Constitution.
Under what authority are tribunals created?	By statute.
What type of procedural rules apply to courts?	Strict procedural rules.
What type of procedure is followed by tribunals?	Flexible procedure.
Who presides over courts?	Legally trained judges.
Who may be included in tribunals apart from legal experts?	Technical experts.
What type of system do courts form part of?	The formal judicial system.
What type of body is a tribunal in dispute resolution?	A specialized dispute resolution body.
Must tribunals follow the principles of natural justice?	Yes, tribunals must follow the principles of natural justice.

7.3 TRIBUNALS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
What is the subject matter of Tribunals under the Constitution?	It explains the constitutional provisions recognizing tribunals in India.
Which amendment formally recognized tribunals in the Constitution of India?	The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.
Which Articles were introduced to provide for tribunals under the Constitution?	Articles 323-A and 323-B.
What does Article 323-A of the Constitution provide for?	Administrative Tribunals dealing with service matters of public servants.
What type of disputes are handled by tribunals under Article 323-A?	Service matters of public servants.
What does Article 323-B of the Constitution allow?	Establishment of tribunals by Parliament and State Legislatures.
For what types of matters may tribunals be established under Article 323-B?	Taxation, labour disputes, land reforms, elections and ceiling on urban property.
Who may establish tribunals under Article 323-B?	Parliament and State Legislatures.
Into how many broad categories can tribunals be classified?	Two categories.
What are the two main types of tribunals?	Administrative tribunals and specialized tribunals.
What matters are dealt with by administrative tribunals?	Service matters of government employees.
Which is an example of an administrative tribunal?	Central Administrative Tribunal.
What are specialized tribunals?	Tribunals established to deal with specific subject matters.
What is an example of a specialized tribunal dealing with taxation matters?	Tax tribunals.
What is an example of a specialized tribunal dealing with labour disputes?	Labour tribunals.
What is an example of a specialized tribunal dealing with consumer disputes?	Consumer tribunals

7.4 Powers of Tribunals
What is the subject matter of Powers of Tribunals?	It explains the powers exercised by tribunals in adjudicating disputes.
What type of powers do tribunals generally possess?	Powers similar to those of civil courts.
What power do tribunals have regarding witnesses?	The power to summon witnesses.
What power do tribunals have regarding evidence?	The power to receive evidence.
What power do tribunals have regarding documents?	The power to require production of documents.
What authority do tribunals have after hearing disputes?	The power to issue orders and decisions.
Are tribunals strictly bound by the Civil Procedure Code?	No, they are not strictly bound by it.
Are tribunals strictly bound by the Evidence Act?	No, they are not strictly bound by it.
Do tribunals still follow principles of the Civil Procedure Code and Evidence Act?	Yes, they often follow these principles.
How does the procedure of tribunals differ from ordinary courts?	It is simpler and more flexible.
What objective do tribunals pursue through simplified procedures?	Speedy justice.
What advantage do tribunals offer in handling technical matters?	Technical expertise.
How do tribunals benefit litigants in terms of cost?	They provide inexpensive dispute resolution.
Despite procedural flexibility, what principles must tribunals follow?	Principles of natural justice.
What hearing requirement must tribunals observe?	Fair hearing.
What type of orders must tribunals provide while deciding cases?	Reasoned decisions or speaking orders.

7.5 APPEALS FROM TRIBUNALS
What is the subject matter of Appeals from Tribunals?	It explains the judicial review of tribunal decisions by constitutional courts.
Are decisions of tribunals subject to judicial review?	Yes, they are subject to judicial review by High Courts or the Supreme Court.
Which case clarified the judicial review of tribunal decisions?	L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding the jurisdiction of tribunals in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Tribunals cannot completely replace the jurisdiction of High Courts.
Under which constitutional provisions are tribunal decisions subject to judicial review?	Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
What constitutional principle was reaffirmed in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.

7.6 ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS
What is the subject matter of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985?	It explains the establishment, jurisdiction and powers of administrative tribunals in India.
Why was the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 enacted?	To implement Article 323-A of the Constitution.
Which tribunals were established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985?	Central Administrative Tribunal and State Administrative Tribunals.
What is the Central Administrative Tribunal commonly known as?	CAT.
What type of disputes are dealt with by administrative tribunals under the Act?	Disputes relating to recruitment and service conditions of public servants.
What matters fall within the jurisdiction of administrative tribunals?	Recruitment of public servants.
What service-related matters fall under tribunal jurisdiction?	Service conditions.
What employment advancement issues can administrative tribunals decide?	Promotions and transfers.
What disciplinary matters fall within the jurisdiction of administrative tribunals?	Disciplinary proceedings against public servants.
Which category of persons is excluded from the jurisdiction of administrative tribunals?	Members of the armed forces.
Which judicial officers are excluded from the jurisdiction of administrative tribunals?	Officers of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
What powers similar to civil courts are exercised by tribunals?	Summoning witnesses.
What evidentiary powers do tribunals possess?	Examining documents.
What authority do tribunals have regarding evidence?	Taking evidence on oath.
Do tribunals have power to review their own decisions?	Yes, in certain circumstances.
What type of jurisdiction do administrative tribunals primarily exercise?	Original jurisdiction.
Can tribunals also exercise appellate jurisdiction?	Yes, if provided by the statute creating them.
Are tribunal decisions subject to judicial review?	Yes, by constitutional courts.
Why were tribunals created in the judicial system?	To reduce the burden on ordinary courts.
What concern exists regarding independence of tribunals?	Lack of independence from the executive.
What procedural concern is often raised regarding tribunals?	Procedural inefficiencies.
What infrastructural issue affects tribunal functioning?	Inadequate infrastructure.
Why has the functioning of tribunals been frequently scrutinized by courts?	Due to concerns regarding independence, procedure and infrastructure.
What is the subject matter of Regulatory Bodies?	It explains statutory authorities regulating specific sectors of the economy.
What are regulatory bodies?	Statutory authorities established to regulate and supervise specific sectors.
What objective do regulatory bodies promote regarding markets?	Fair competition.
What consumer-related function do regulatory bodies perform?	Consumer protection.
What economic objective do regulatory bodies ensure?	Efficient functioning of markets.
What types of functions are often performed simultaneously by regulatory bodies?	Legislative, executive and quasi-judicial functions.
Why does modern economic governance require specialized regulation?	Because markets have become complex.
Why is technical expertise necessary in economic regulation?	Because modern markets involve complex technical matters.
Why is consumer protection a reason for establishing regulatory bodies?	Because regulatory oversight is required to safeguard consumer interests.
What role do regulatory bodies play in economic governance?	They regulate and supervise markets.
What governance values are promoted by regulatory bodies?	Transparency, accountability and fair competition.

7.7 MAJOR REGULATORY BODIES IN INDIA
What is the subject matter of Major Regulatory Bodies in India?	It explains important statutory authorities regulating different sectors of the Indian economy.
What are the major regulatory bodies in India?	Competition Commission of India (CCI), Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERC), Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) and Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
What is the Competition Commission of India (CCI)?	A statutory regulatory body established under the Competition Act, 2002.
What is the primary objective of the Competition Commission of India?	To prevent practices having an adverse effect on competition.
What types of agreements are regulated by the Competition Commission of India?	Anti-competitive agreements.
What market abuse does the Competition Commission of India prevent?	Abuse of dominant position.
What corporate transactions are regulated by the Competition Commission of India?	Mergers and acquisitions.
What are Electricity Regulatory Commissions?	Statutory regulatory bodies established under the Electricity Act, 2003.
What major function do Electricity Regulatory Commissions perform regarding electricity pricing?	Regulating electricity tariffs.
What licensing function is performed by Electricity Regulatory Commissions?	Licensing electricity distribution companies.
What economic objective do Electricity Regulatory Commissions promote?	Competition in electricity markets.
What types of Electricity Regulatory Commissions exist in India?	Central and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions.
What is the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)?	A statutory regulatory authority established under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997.
What is the main regulatory function of TRAI regarding telecom services?	Regulating telecom services.
What pricing power does TRAI possess?	Fixing telecom tariffs.
What competition-related role does TRAI perform?	Ensuring fair competition among telecom operators.
What is the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI)?	A statutory regulatory authority established under the IRDA Act, 1999.
What is the regulatory role of IRDAI regarding insurance companies?	Regulating insurance companies.
What consumer protection function does IRDAI perform?	Protecting policyholders.
What developmental role does IRDAI play in the insurance sector?	Promoting development of the insurance industry.
What is the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)?	A statutory regulatory authority established under the SEBI Act, 1992.
What is the primary objective of SEBI?	Protecting investors and regulating the securities market.
What institutions are regulated by SEBI?	Stock exchanges.
What financial malpractice does SEBI prevent?	Insider trading.
What transparency objective does SEBI promote?	Transparency in financial markets.

7.8 LANDMARK JUDGMENTS
What is the subject matter of Landmark Judgments on Tribunals?	It explains important Supreme Court decisions relating to tribunals and their constitutional position.
What are the landmark judgments relating to tribunals in India?	S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India, L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, Union of India v. R. Gandhi, Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma, Durga Shankar Mehta v. Thakur Raghuraj Singh, Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank and Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd.
What was the first major case on administrative tribunals after the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985?	S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding tribunals in S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India?	Tribunals can replace High Courts in certain matters.
What condition did the Court impose on tribunals in S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India?	They must provide effective and independent adjudication.
What principle was emphasized in S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India?	Tribunals must act as effective substitutes for courts.
Which is the most important case on tribunals in India?	L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.
What did the Supreme Court hold regarding judicial review in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 cannot be excluded.
What did the Court decide regarding tribunal decisions in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Tribunal decisions are subject to scrutiny by High Courts.
What constitutional principle was reaffirmed in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India?	Judicial review of High Courts is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Which case dealt with the constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal?	Union of India v. R. Gandhi.
What did the Court hold regarding qualifications of tribunal members in Union of India v. R. Gandhi?	Members must possess adequate judicial qualifications.
What institutional concern did the Court address in Union of India v. R. Gandhi?	Executive dominance in tribunals must be avoided.
What principle was emphasized in Union of India v. R. Gandhi?	Tribunals must maintain judicial independence.
Which case examined the structure and functioning of tribunals in India?	Madras Bar Association v. Union of India.
What did the Court hold regarding tribunal appointments in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India?	Appointments must preserve judicial independence.
What administrative limitation did the Court impose in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India?	The executive cannot dominate tribunal administration.
What principle was emphasized in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India?	Tribunals must function with institutional independence similar to courts.
Which case explained the meaning of a tribunal?	Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma.
What characteristics must a tribunal possess according to Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma?	Judicial powers of the State, authority to adjudicate disputes and duty to act judicially.
Which case clarified that authorities exercising judicial functions may be treated as tribunals?	Durga Shankar Mehta v. Thakur Raghuraj Singh.
What principle was established in Durga Shankar Mehta v. Thakur Raghuraj Singh?	Bodies exercising judicial powers under statute can be treated as tribunals.
Which early case examined whether industrial tribunals are courts or tribunals?	Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank.
What did the Court hold regarding industrial tribunals in Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank?	Industrial tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies and not courts.
Which case examined the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities Rules, 2017?	Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd.
What principle was emphasized in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd.?	Tribunal rules regarding appointments and service conditions must ensure judicial independence.

Download Administrative Law One Liner Notes PDF

Free Judiciary Coaching

Free Judiciary Notes

Free Judiciary Mock Tests

Bare Acts

Similar Options

Useful Pages

Search...