
|
THE PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 |
|
|
|
|
|
PREAMBLE |
|
|
What is the official title of the statute enacted to deal with public gambling? |
The statute is titled the Public Gambling Act, 1867. |
|
What is the Act number assigned to the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
It is Act No. 3 of 1867. |
|
On which date was the Public Gambling Act, 1867 enacted? |
The Act was enacted on 25th January, 1867. |
|
What conduct does the long title of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 expressly seek to punish? |
It seeks to punish public gambling and the keeping of common gaming houses. |
|
Which territories are expressly mentioned in the long title as the area of application of the Act? |
The United Provinces, East Punjab, Delhi, and the Central Provinces. |
|
What is the legal significance of the Preamble in construing the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
It explains the object and purpose of the legislation. |
|
What phrase marks the commencement of the operative provisions after the Preamble? |
The phrase “It is hereby enacted as follows”. |
|
What does section 1 deal with? |
Interpretation-Clause |
|
What expression is defined under Section 1 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
The expression defined is “common gaming-house”. |
|
What types of premises are included within the definition of a common gaming-house? |
Any house, walled enclosure, room, or place is included. |
|
What items must be kept or used in a place to qualify it as a common gaming-house? |
Cards, dice, tables, or other instruments of gaming. |
|
Is the mere presence of gaming instruments sufficient to constitute a common gaming-house? |
No, they must be kept or used for profit or gain. |
|
For whose benefit must the profit or gain arise to constitute a common gaming-house? |
The profit or gain must arise for the person owning, occupying, using, or keeping such house, enclosure, room or place. |
|
Does charging for the use of the premises itself fall within the definition of a common gaming-house? |
Yes, charging for the use of the house, enclosure, room, or place is included. |
|
What is the significance of the phrase “or otherwise howsoever” in the definition? |
It widens the scope to include all forms of profit or gain, irrespective of the method. |
|
Does the definition require proof of actual gambling at the time of inspection? |
No, keeping or using instruments for profit or gain is sufficient. |
|
What does section 2 deals with? |
Power to extend Act. |
|
Which sections of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 extend automatically to the whole of the said States? |
Sections 13 and 17 extend automatically to the whole of the said States. |
|
Which authority is empowered to extend the remaining provisions of the Act? |
The State Government is empowered to extend the remaining provisions. |
|
Is the extension of the remaining sections mandatory or discretionary? |
The extension is discretionary, as it depends on the State Government thinking fit. |
|
By what mode must the State Government extend the remaining sections of the Act? |
By a notification published in the Official Gazette. |
|
What is the minimum publication requirement for a notification extending the Act? |
The notification must be published in three successive numbers of the Official Gazette. |
|
To which areas can the remaining sections of the Act be extended by notification? |
Any city, town, suburb, railway-station, house, or place. |
|
What is the maximum permissible distance for extending the Act beyond a railway-station? |
Not more than three miles from any part of such station-house. |
|
Does the Act permit extension to individual houses and places? |
Yes, it expressly permits extension to any house or place. |
|
What power does the State Government have regarding territorial limits in the notification? |
It may define the limits for the purposes of the Act. |
|
Can the limits defined under a notification be modified later? |
Yes, the State Government may alter the limits from time to time. |
|
From which date do the extended provisions of the Act become operative? |
From the date of such extension. |
|
What happens to existing rules having the force of law upon extension of the Act? |
Such rules cease to have effect to the extent of inconsistency or repugnancy. |
|
Does every existing rule automatically cease upon extension of the Act? |
No, only those rules which are inconsistent with or repugnant to the extended sections cease to have effect. |
|
In which territories do inconsistent rules lose their effect after extension? |
In the territories to which the extension has been made. |
|
What does section 3 deals with? |
Penalty for owning or keeping, or having charge of a gaming-house. |
|
Who can be held liable under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 for operating a gaming-house? |
Any owner or occupier, or person having the use of a house, walled enclosure, room, or place situated within the limits to which this Act applies, who opens, keeps, or uses it as a common gaming-house. |
|
What conduct constitutes an offence when committed by an owner or occupier under Section 3? |
Opening, keeping, or using the premises as a common gaming-house. |
|
What additional mens rea is required when liability is based on permitting use by another person? |
The owner or occupier must knowingly or wilfully permit such use. |
|
Can an owner be punished for allowing another person to run a gaming-house on his premises? |
Yes, if he knowingly or wilfully permits it. |
|
Who is liable under Section 3 for managerial involvement in a gaming-house? |
Any person having care or management of, or assisting in conducting, the business of such gaming-house. |
|
Is active management necessary to attract liability under Section 3? |
No, even assisting in conducting the business is sufficient. |
|
Does Section 3 extend liability to financiers of gambling activities? |
Yes, persons who advance or furnish money for gaming purposes are liable. |
|
For what purpose must money be advanced to attract liability under Section 3? |
For the purpose of gaming with persons frequenting the gaming-house. |
|
What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 3? |
A fine not exceeding two hundred rupees. |
|
What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 3? |
Imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding three months. |
|
How is the expression “imprisonment of either description” to be understood? |
It has the meaning assigned under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. |
|
What does Section 4 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with the penalty for being found in a gaming-house. |
|
Who can be punished under Section 4 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Any person found in a common gaming-house playing or gaming, or present for the purpose of gaming. |
|
What acts constitute gaming under Section 4? |
Playing or gaming with cards, dice, counters, money, or other instruments of gaming. |
|
Is actual playing necessary to attract liability under Section 4? |
No, mere presence for the purpose of gaming is sufficient. |
|
Does Section 4 apply only when money or wager is involved? |
No, it applies whether gaming is for money, wager, stake, or otherwise. |
|
What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 4? |
A fine not exceeding one hundred rupees. |
|
What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 4? |
Imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding one month. |
|
How is the expression “imprisonment of either description” to be understood under Section 4? |
It has the meaning assigned under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. |
|
What legal presumption is created under Section 4 regarding presence in a gaming-house? |
A person found in a common gaming-house during gaming is presumed to be there for the purpose of gaming. |
|
Is the presumption under Section 4 conclusive? |
No, the presumption is rebuttable until the contrary is proved. |
|
When does the presumption under Section 4 arise? |
When a person is found in a common gaming-house during any gaming or playing therein. |
|
What does Section 5 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with the powers to enter and authorise police to enter and search. |
|
Which authorities are empowered to act under Section 5? |
The Magistrate of a district, any officer invested with full powers of a Magistrate, and the District Superintendent of Police. |
|
What is the threshold requirement before action can be taken under Section 5? |
The authority must have credible information and reason to believe that the house, walled enclosure, room or place, is used as a common gaming-house. |
|
Is prior enquiry mandatory before exercising powers under Section 5? |
Yes, such enquiry as the authority may think necessary must be conducted. |
|
Can the empowered authority personally enter the suspected premises? |
Yes, the authority may himself enter the premises. |
|
Can the empowered authority authorise a police officer to conduct the entry and search? |
Yes, entry and search may be authorised by warrant. |
|
What is the minimum rank of the police officer who may be authorised under Section 5? |
An officer not below the rank appointed by the State Government. |
|
Can entry under Section 5 be made during night hours? |
Yes, entry may be made by night or by day. |
|
Is the use of force permitted while entering under Section 5? |
Yes, force may be used if necessary. |
|
Can persons found in the premises be taken into custody even if not gaming? |
Yes, all persons found therein may be taken into custody whether or not actually gaming. |
|
What categories of items may be seized under Section 5? |
Instruments of gaming, money, securities for money, and articles of value. |
|
What standard governs the seizure of money and articles of value? |
They must be reasonably suspected to have been used or intended for gaming. |
|
Does Section 5 permit the search of concealed places within the premises? |
Yes, all parts of the premises may be searched if there is reason to believe gaming instruments are concealed. |
|
Can the persons taken into custody be searched under Section 5? |
Yes, the persons of those taken into custody may be searched. |
|
Is a fresh authority required to seize instruments found during a search? |
No, instruments found upon such search may be seized under the same authority. |
|
What does Section 6 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with Finding cards, etc., in suspected houses, to be evidence that such houses are common gaming houses |
|
What factual circumstance triggers the application of Section 6? |
The finding of gaming instruments during a lawful entry or search under Section 5. |
|
Which items, when found, attract the presumption under Section 6? |
Cards, dice, gaming-tables, cloths, boards, or other instruments of gaming. |
|
Where must the gaming instruments be found to invoke Section 6? |
In the premises searched under Section 5 or on the person of those found therein. |
|
What is the first presumption created under Section 6 regarding the premises? |
That the premises are used as a common gaming-house. |
|
What is the second presumption created under Section 6 regarding persons found therein? |
That the persons were present for the purpose of gaming. |
|
Is actual gaming required to be witnessed for the presumption under Section 6 to arise? |
No, the presumption applies even if no play was actually seen. |
|
Against whom can the presumption under Section 6 operate? |
Against the house, enclosure, room, or place and the persons found therein. |
|
Is the presumption created under Section 6 conclusive? |
No, it operates until the contrary is made to appear. |
|
Who bears the burden of disproving the presumption under Section 6? |
The person against whom the presumption is raised. |
|
Does the presumption depend on the personal observation of gaming by the Magistrate or police officer? |
No, it applies notwithstanding absence of such observation. |
|
What does Section 7 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with penalty for giving false names or addresses |
|
To whom does Section 7 apply? |
It applies to persons found in a common gaming-house entered under the Act. |
|
At what stage can a person be required to give his name and address under Section 7? |
Upon arrest by a police officer or upon being brought before a Magistrate. |
|
Who is competent to demand the name and address under Section 7? |
A police officer or a Magistrate. |
|
What conduct attracts liability under Section 7? |
Refusing or neglecting to give name and address, or giving a false name or address. |
|
Is mens rea expressly required for liability under Section 7? |
No, refusal, neglect, or falsity itself attracts liability. |
|
Before whom must conviction under Section 7 take place? |
Before the same or any other Magistrate. |
|
What is the maximum monetary penalty prescribed under Section 7? |
A penalty not exceeding five hundred rupees. |
|
Can costs be imposed in addition to the penalty under Section 7? |
Yes, reasonable costs may be imposed as determined by the Magistrate. |
|
What happens upon non-payment of penalty and costs under Section 7? |
The person may be imprisoned. |
|
What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 7? |
Imprisonment for a period not exceeding one month. |
|
Can imprisonment be ordered even without first ordering payment of penalty and costs? |
Yes, imprisonment may be ordered in the first instance if the Magistrate thinks fit. |
|
What does Section 8 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with on conviction for keeping a gaming-house, instruments of gaming to be destroyed. |
|
Upon whose conviction can powers under Section 8 be exercised? |
Upon conviction of a person for keeping or using a common gaming-house or being present therein for the purpose of gaming. |
|
Which authority is empowered to pass orders under Section 8? |
The convicting Magistrate. |
|
What order may the Magistrate pass regarding instruments of gaming under Section 8? |
He may order all instruments of gaming found therein to be destroyed. |
|
Is destruction of instruments of gaming mandatory under Section 8? |
No, it is discretionary, as indicated by the word “may”. |
|
Can the Magistrate pass orders regarding items other than instruments of gaming? |
Yes, he may pass orders regarding securities for money and other articles seized. |
|
What action may be taken with respect to securities for money and other articles seized? |
They may be sold and converted into money. |
|
What may be done with the proceeds of sale and money seized under Section 8? |
They may be forfeited. |
|
Does the Magistrate have discretion regarding forfeiture of seized money and proceeds? |
Yes, he may order forfeiture or direct return in whole or in part. |
|
To whom can the Magistrate order the return of money or proceeds? |
To persons appearing to be severally entitled thereto. |
|
Is the Magistrate bound to return property to the accused upon conviction? |
No, return is discretionary and subject to entitlement appearing before the Magistrate. |
|
Does Section 8 apply only to persons convicted of keeping a gaming-house? |
No, it also applies to persons convicted of being present therein for the purpose of gaming. |
|
What does Section 9 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with the proof of playing for stakes is unnecessary |
|
Is it necessary to prove that gaming involved money, wager, or stake to convict under Section 9? |
No, proof of playing for any money, wager, or stake is not necessary. |
|
To which offences does Section 9 apply? |
Keeping a common gaming-house or being concerned in its management. |
|
Does Section 9 alter the substantive offence under the Act? |
No, it only affects the proof required to secure conviction. |
|
Does Section 9 apply to both owners and managers of gaming-houses? |
Yes, it applies to anyone concerned in the management as well as those keeping the house. |
|
Is the presence of gaming instruments alone sufficient under Section 9 to support a conviction? |
Yes, actual stakes or wagers need not be proved. |
|
Does Section 9 limit the presumption created under Section 6? |
No, Section 9 supplements the evidentiary scheme but does not limit presumptions under Section 6. |
|
What does Section 10 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with the power of a Magistrate to require persons found in a gaming-house to be sworn and give evidence. |
|
Who can be required to give evidence under Section 10? |
Any person found in a house, walled enclosure, room, or place entered under the Act. |
|
Before whom can the evidence be required? |
Before the Magistrate to whom the person is brought, any other Magistrate, or any Court in proceedings relating to unlawful gaming. |
|
On what subjects may the Magistrate examine a person under Section 10? |
Evidence touching unlawful gaming in the premises, or acts obstructing, delaying, or preventing entry of a Magistrate or authorised officer. |
|
Can a person refuse to answer questions on the ground that it may incriminate him? |
No, the person cannot be excused on the ground of self-incrimination. |
|
Is the obligation to give evidence limited to the first examination? |
No, it extends to any subsequent examination by the same or any other Magistrate or Court relating to the matter. |
|
What happens if a person refuses to be sworn, take affirmation, or answer questions under Section 10? |
The person shall be dealt with as if committing an offence under section 178 or 179 of the IPC, 1860. |
|
Does Section 10 require prior consent of the person for examination? |
No, examination is mandatory and lawful regardless of consent. |
|
Can the Magistrate compel testimony regarding acts intended to obstruct lawful entry? |
Yes, the Magistrate can examine regarding acts preventing, obstructing, or delaying entry. |
|
Is the penal consequence under Section 10 for refusal independent of other offences? |
Yes, refusal to comply attracts separate IPC-based penalties irrespective of other offences. |
|
What does Section 11 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with indemnification of witnesses |
|
Who is eligible for indemnity under Section 11? |
Any person who has been concerned in gaming contrary to the Act and is examined as a witness. |
|
Before whom must the person be examined to qualify for indemnity? |
Before a Magistrate on the trial of any person for a breach of the Act. |
|
What is the key condition for granting indemnity under Section 11? |
The person must make a true and faithful discovery to the best of his knowledge, as judged by the Magistrate. |
|
Who determines whether the discovery is true and faithful? |
The Magistrate before whom the person is examined. |
|
What form does the indemnity take under Section 11? |
A certificate in writing issued by the Magistrate. |
|
From what is the witness freed upon receiving the certificate? |
From all prosecutions under the Act for anything done before the time of examination in respect of such gaming. |
|
Does indemnity under Section 11 cover future offences? |
No, it only covers acts done prior to the examination. |
|
Is the issuance of the certificate mandatory once truthful disclosure is made? |
It is at the discretion of the Magistrate, based on the opinion that the discovery was true and faithful. |
|
Does Section 11 require the witness to confess only partial involvement to receive protection? |
No, full and faithful disclosure of all matters examined is required. |
|
What does Section 12 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with the act not to apply to certain games. |
|
Which types of games are expressly excluded from the Act under Section 12? |
Any game of mere skill. |
|
Does Section 12 restrict the place where games of skill are played? |
No, it applies wherever the game is played. |
|
Do the provisions of the Act apply to games involving chance under Section 12? |
No, Section 12 only excludes games of mere skill; games involving chance remain covered. |
|
Is there any exception provided under Section 12 for betting on games of skill? |
Section 12 does not mention betting; it only excludes mere skill games from application. |
|
Does Section 12 limit the definition of gambling in the rest of the Act? |
Yes, by clarifying that mere skill games are not considered gambling under the Act. |
|
What does Section 13 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
It deals with Gaming and setting birds and animals to fight in public streets. |
|
Who may apprehend persons under Section 13? |
A police officer may apprehend without warrant. |
|
Which persons are liable to apprehension under Section 13 for gambling? |
Any person playing for money or other valuable thing with cards, dice, counters, or other gaming instruments in a public street, place, or thoroughfare, not being a game of mere skill. |
|
Does Section 13 apply to private places? |
No, it applies only to public streets, places, or thoroughfares. |
|
Who else may be apprehended under Section 13 besides gamblers? |
Any person setting birds or animals to fight in public streets, or any person aiding and abetting such fighting. |
|
Where must the animals or birds be set to fight to attract liability under Section 13? |
In any public street, place, or thoroughfare within the Act's limits. |
|
What is the procedure after apprehension under Section 13? |
The person must be brought without delay before a Magistrate. |
|
What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 13? |
A fine not exceeding fifty rupees. |
|
What is the maximum term of imprisonment under Section 13? |
Imprisonment, either simple or rigorous, for up to one calendar month. |
|
Which instruments may the police seize under Section 13? |
Police officer may seize all instruments of gaming found in the public place or on the person of those arrested. |
|
Who has the authority to order destruction of seized instruments under Section 13? |
The Magistrate may order destruction on conviction of the offender. |
|
Is destruction of gaming instruments mandatory under Section 13? |
Yes, the Magistrate may order them to be forthwith destroyed upon conviction. |
|
Does Section 13 require proof of playing for stakes for apprehension? |
Yes, playing must be for money or other valuable thing; mere presence is insufficient. |
|
What is the subject matter of Section 14 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Section 14 deals with the offences by whom triable. |
|
Which court is competent to try offences punishable under the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Any Magistrate having jurisdiction over the place where the offence is committed is competent to try offences under the Act. |
|
On what basis is territorial jurisdiction determined for trial under Section 14 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Territorial jurisdiction is determined by the place where the offence is committed. |
|
Does Section 14 confer unlimited sentencing powers on the Magistrate trying offences under the Act? |
No, the Magistrate’s power to impose fine or imprisonment is restricted by the limits of jurisdiction prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
|
Which procedural law governs the limits of punishment that a Magistrate may impose under Section 14? |
The limits of fine and imprisonment are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
|
What is the subject matter of Section 14-A inserted by the Uttar Pradesh State Amendment in the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Section 14-A deals with the compounding of offences punishable under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in the State of Uttar Pradesh. |
|
Who is competent to compound offences under Section 14-A of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 as applicable in Uttar Pradesh? |
An officer specially empowered by the State Government through a notification is competent to compound offences under Section 14-A. |
|
Is the power of compounding under Section 14-A absolute in nature? |
No, the power of compounding is subject to any general or special orders issued by the State Government. |
|
At what stage can an offence under the Public Gambling Act be compounded under Section 14-A? |
An offence may be compounded either before or after the institution of prosecution. |
|
What is the basis for determining the amount of composition fee under Section 14-A? |
The composition fee is determined at the discretion of the empowered officer but cannot exceed the maximum amount of fine prescribed for the offence. |
|
What is the legal effect of compounding an offence before the institution of prosecution under Section 14-A? |
If compounded before prosecution, the offender shall not be liable to prosecution for such offence. |
|
What is the consequence if an offender is in custody and the offence is compounded before prosecution under Section 14-A? |
The offender shall be set at liberty if the offence is compounded before the institution of prosecution. |
|
What is the legal consequence of compounding an offence after the institution of prosecution under Section 14-A? |
Compounding after the institution of prosecution shall amount to acquittal of the offender. |
|
Does Section 14-A permit compounding of repeat offences under the Public Gambling Act? |
No, Section 14-A expressly prohibits the compounding of any subsequent offence committed by an offender previously convicted under the Act. |
|
What is the statutory limitation imposed by the proviso to Section 14-A? |
The proviso bars compounding of offences committed by a person who has once been convicted for any offence punishable under the Act. |
|
Which State enactment introduced Section 14-A into the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
Section 14-A was inserted by the Uttar Pradesh Act 35 of 1979. |
|
What does the provision relating to abatement of certain trials deal with? |
It provides for statutory abatement of specified criminal trials and preventive proceedings notwithstanding anything contained in any other law in force. |
|
What is the overriding nature of the provision on abatement of certain trials? |
It operates notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force. |
|
Which category of proceedings is covered under clause (1) of the abatement provision? |
Clause (1) covers trials of accused persons for specified offences. |
|
Which offences under the Motor Vehicles Act are covered for abatement under this provision? |
Trials for offences punishable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are covered for abatement. |
|
Which offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 are excluded from abatement? |
Offences punishable under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 and wagering offences punishable under Section 13 of that Act are excluded from abatement. |
|
Which offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 are eligible for abatement under this provision? |
All offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 except those punishable under Sections 3 and 13 are eligible for abatement. |
|
Is an offence under Section 34 of the Police Act, 1861 covered by the abatement provision? |
Yes, trials for offences punishable under Section 34 of the Police Act, 1861 shall abate. |
|
Is an offence under Section 160 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 covered under the abatement provision? |
Yes, trials for offences punishable under Section 160 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 shall abate. |
|
Are offences punishable with fine only covered under the abatement provision? |
Yes, trials for any other offence punishable with fine only are covered for abatement. |
|
Which category of proceedings is covered under clause (2) of the abatement provision? |
Clause (2) covers preventive proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. |
|
What is the condition for abatement of proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 CrPC? |
The proceedings must be pending before a Magistrate on the date of commencement of the Act. |
|
What is the cut-off date specified for abatement of pending proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 CrPC? |
Proceedings pending from before December 31, 2015 shall abate. |
|
Does the provision require any judicial discretion for abatement to take effect? |
No, abatement takes effect statutorily by operation of law. |
|
What is the legal effect of abatement under this provision? |
Abatement results in termination of the trial or proceeding without adjudication on merits. |
|
Which Uttar Pradesh enactments govern the insertion and amendment of this abatement provision? |
The provision was enacted by Uttar Pradesh Act 35 of 1979 and amended by Uttar Pradesh Acts 29 of 2016 and 9 of 2018. |
|
What does Section 15 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
Section 15 provides for the Penalty for subsequent offence. |
|
To whom does Section 15 apply under the Public Gambling Act, 1867? |
It applies to a person who has already been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 3 or Section 4. |
|
Which prior conviction is mandatory for invoking Section 15? |
A prior conviction under Section 3 or Section 4 of the Act is mandatory. |
|
Is it necessary that the subsequent offence be under the same section as the first offence? |
No, the subsequent offence may be under either Section 3 or Section 4. |
|
What is the quantum of punishment prescribed for a subsequent offence under Section 15? |
The offender is liable to double the amount of punishment applicable for the first offence of the same description. |
|
How is the punishment calculated for a subsequent offence under Section 15? |
The punishment is calculated by doubling the punishment prescribed for the first commission of an offence of the same description. |
|
What is the maximum fine that can be imposed under Section 15? |
The fine shall not exceed six hundred rupees. |
|
What is the maximum term of imprisonment that can be imposed under Section 15? |
The imprisonment shall not exceed one year. |
|
What does Section 16 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
Section 16 deals with the Portion of fine may be paid to informer |
|
Which authority is competent to order payment to an informer under Section 16? |
The Magistrate trying the case is competent to order such payment. |
|
Under which sections’ fines can a portion be paid to an informer under Section 16? |
A portion of any fine levied under Sections 3 and 4 may be paid to an informer. |
|
Apart from fines, what other amounts can be directed to be paid to an informer under Section 16? |
Any part of the moneys or proceeds of articles seized and ordered to be forfeited under the Act may be paid to an informer. |
|
What does Section 17 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? |
Section 17 provides for the recovery and application of fines imposed under the Act. |
|
How are fines imposed under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 to be recovered? |
All fines imposed under the Act are recoverable in the manner prescribed by Section 61 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
|
18. [Offences under this Act to be “offences” within the meaning of Penal Code.] Rep. by the Repealing Act, 1874 (16 of 1874), s. 1 and the Schedule, Pt. I. |
|