ACCEPTANCE MUST BE ABSOLUTE AND UNQUALIFIED
The first and foremost essential of a valid acceptance is that it must be absolute and unconditional as well.
According to Section 7 of the Act of 1872, to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified. If there is a variation in the acceptance, the acceptance will not be considered acceptance but a counter-proposal itself, and there is no contract unless the counter proposal is accepted by the original proposer.
For Example, A offered to purchase a property on certain terms, saying that possession would be given before March 5. B agreed to the conditions but said he would give possession on the 1st of April; it was not held to be an acceptance of A's offer.
HYDE V WRENCH (1840) 49 ER 132
The defendant offered to sell the plaintiff his farm for $1,000. However, the plaintiff only agreed to pay $950. Later, when he agreed to pay $1,000 for the farm, the defendant refused to sell it. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the same, thereby approaching the court of law. It was observed that the plaintiff's offer of $950 was a counteroffer, which rendered the initial offer invalid. Thus, the plaintiff's lawsuit was dismissed.
COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE MUST BE MADE BY THE ACCEPTOR OR HIS AGENT
A valid communication of acceptance must be made either by the offeror himself or his authorised agent, communication of acceptance by any other person will not be valid.
POWELL V. LEE (1908) 99 LT 284
The board of managers of a school passed a resolution to select the plaintiff for the post of headmaster, but the decision about his selection was not told or communicated to him. One of the managers informed him of the results of the selection, but later on, the board of managers rescinded their decision, and consequently, the plaintiff was not selected as the headmaster. The King's Bench Division held that no contract was formed because the communication of acceptance to be valid must be made by the offeree himself or an authorised agent and not by any unauthorised person.
THE ACCEPTANCE MUST BE EXPRESSED IN SOME USUAL AND REASONABLE MANNER
According to Section 7 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the acceptance must be expressed in some reasonable and usual manner, unless the proposal is made in the manner in which it is to be accepted. If the proposal prescribes a manner in which it should be or is meant to be accepted, and if the acceptance is not made in such a manner, then the proposer may, within a reasonable time after the acceptance is communicated to him, insist that his proposal be accepted in the manner it was meant and not otherwise. If he fails to do so in the prescribed manner, he accepts the acceptance.
For Example, if P offers to sell his watch for Rs. 500, Q may accept this offer orally, by sending a telegram, or by sending a letter. But if P says in the offer that acceptance is to be communicated only with a telegram text, then Q should accept it by sending the telegram text. And if Q sends a postcard for acceptance, then P can object to it and insist that his offer is only accepted via telegram. But if P does not insist upon it, then he is accepting the acceptance as actually communicated.
If the manner of acceptance is not prescribed, the acceptance must be expressed in some reasonable and usual manner. The credibility of being reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the particular case and the nature of the proposal.
If the proposal is made via text, then the acceptance is also expected by the text, but if the proposal is made orally, an oral acceptance is accepted.
ACCEPTANCE OF AN OFFER IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF ALL ITS TERMS
If the terms of an offer are not apparent on the face of it and no reasonable precaution is taken to draw the attention of the acceptor, then those terms will not be considered binding. For example, if the attention of the passenger was not drawn to the clause saying that "the bus company will not be liable for any loss or damage of the luggage", then it will be held that in the suit for the loss of luggage, the bus authority is not liable.
HARRIS VS. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RY. CO. (1952),
Harris deposited luggage at the cloak room and received a ticket on which it was printed that, "left subject to the condition on the other side. This ticket will be given up when the luggage is taken away". On the back of the ticket was a condition that the company would not be responsible for loss of or injury to the luggage beyond the value of $5 unless extra payment was made. He knew that there were conditions on the back but didn't read them, and later on the luggage was lost. It was held that the company was not liable as the extra payment had not been made.
A MERE ANSWER TO A QUESTION CAN NEITHER CONSTITUTE AN OFFER NOR ACCEPTANCE
A mere answer to a question will not constitute either an offer or acceptance. There must be an expression of willingness to be bound
ACCEPTANCE MAY BE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED
An acceptance of an offer may be expressed or implied. Where an offer is accepted by words, written or oral, the acceptance is called express. When an offer is accepted by conduct, the same is termed as implied.
MENTAL ACCEPTANCE IS NO ACCEPTANCE
According to Section 2(b), for an acceptance to be binding, it must be communicated. An intention to accept or even a mental decision to accept a proposal does not give rise to a contract.
There must be some external expression of speech, writing, or other act. Even if the offeree has made up his mind about a final acceptance, the agreement is still not complete.
There should be an eternal manifestation of assent in the words spoken or act done by the communication of acceptance to the offeror.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE GENERAL OFFER NEED NOT TO BE COMMUNICATED
In order to form a legit and valid contract, acceptance of the terms of the offer by the person to whom it was made must be communicated to the person making the offer. An acceptance not communicated to the person making the offer will not bind him to the contract. But in the case of general offers, formal communication of acceptance is not necessary. Fulfilment of the conditions given about the offer is sufficient.
A proposal may be withdrawn at any time up to the completion of the communication of its acceptance as against the proposer, but not after that. Before the acceptance has been fully communicated to the acceptor, it has the potential to be revoked. Let us take, for example, that A offers to sell him his land to B. B responds to the same by post. Before or at the time B posts his letter of acceptance, A may withdraw his offer. But the same cannot be done after the post has been reached. Similarly, B may withdraw his consent at any time before the post reaches A.
There are two conditions by which acceptance of an offer can be revoked are as following-
BY LAPSE OF TIME-
If acceptance is not made, a proposal can be understood to be revoked owing to a discharge of time.
BY NOTICE-
An offer may be revoked by communication of notice to the offeree by the offeror before the communication of acceptance is completed.
MODES OF ACCEPTANCE
There are two modes by which acceptance can happen, they are following as - Communication of acceptance by act-It includes the communication via words, which could be written/oral so will include communication through calls, mails, text etc.
Communication of acceptance by conduct- The offeree can convey the acceptance through some action of his/his conduct. For example, when you are boarding a bus, you are expected to pay the fare via conduct.
Acceptance is considered one of the foremost steps in the process of contract formation. The need for knowing what acceptance signifies and what are the modes involved in the same