
|
ESSENTIAL CASE LAWS FOR EXAM |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Lalita Kumari v. State of UP (2014) |
The Rule: Registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence. |
|
2. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980) |
The Rule: Clarified the distinction between preparation and attempt. An act constitutes an attempt if it is a "proximate" step toward the crime that goes beyond mere preparation. |
|
3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) |
The Rule: Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, ruling that Parliament cannot amend the fundamental features of the Constitution. |
|
4. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) |
The Rule: Laid down 11 mandatory guidelines for arrest and detention to prevent custodial torture. Most of these protections are now codified in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). |
|
5. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) |
The Rule: Declared the Right to Privacy a fundamental right under Article 21. This impacts how digital evidence and search/seizure are handled under the new BSA. |
|
6. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) |
The Rule: Expanded the scope of Article 21, establishing that any procedure depriving a person of life or liberty must be "just, fair, and reasonable," not merely arbitrary. |
|
7. All India Judges Association v. Union of India (2025) |
The Rule: The Supreme Court restored the requirement of 3 years of legal practice for Civil Judge (Junior Division) eligibility. |
|
8. Mahboob Shah v. Emperor (1945) |
The Rule: Distinguished between "common intention" (Section 34 IPC / Section 3(5) BNS) and "similar intention." It requires a prior meeting of minds for joint liability. |
|
9. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) |
The Rule: To prevent misuse of Section 498A (Cruelty), the SC ruled that arrest should not be automatic in offences punishable by less than 7 years of imprisonment. |
|
10. Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1979) |
The Rule: Established the Right to a Speedy Trial as an integral part of Article 21, which is a core objective of the new procedural laws (BNSS). |