Sec 16 to 22 Chapter IV (Recovery of Possession)The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

Sec 16 to 22 Chapter IV (Recovery of Possession)The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

Free Online Judiciary Coaching Classes

16. When landlord may recover possession.—

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this  Act but subject to the provisions of section 25, a landlord shall be entitled to recover possession of any  premises if the court is satisfied— 

(a) that the tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section  108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (IV of 1882); 

Explanation.—

For the purposes of this clause, replacing of tiles or closing of balcony of the  premises shall not be regarded as an act of a causing damage to the building or destructive or  permanently injurious thereto; or  

(b) that the tenant has, without the landlord’s consent given in writing, erected on the  premises any permanent structure; 

Explanation.—

For the purposes of this clause, the expression “permanent structure” does  not include the carrying out of any work with the permission, wherever necessary, of the  municipal authority, for providing a wooden partition, standing cooking platform in kitchen, door,  lattice work of opening of a window necessary for ventilation, a false ceiling, installation of air conditioner, an exhaust outlet or a smoke chimney; or 

(c) that the tenant, his agent, servant, persons inducted by tenant or claiming under the  tenant or, any person residing with the tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance or  annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier, or has been convicted of using the premises  or allowing the premises to be used for immoral or illegal purposes or that the tenant has in  respect of the premises been convicted of an offence of contravention of any of the provisions of  clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 394 or of section 394A of the Mumbai Municipal  Corporation Act (Bom. III of 1888) or of sub-section 394 or of section 376 or of section 376A of  the 1Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (Bom. LIX of 1949), or of section 229  of the 2City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (C. P. and Berar II of 1950); or of  section 280 or of section 281 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and  Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (Mah. XL of 1965); or  

(d) that the tenant has given notice to quit and in consequence of that notice, the landlord  has contracted to sell or let the premises or has taken any other steps as a result of which he  would, in the opinion of the court, be seriously prejudiced, if he could not obtain possession of  the premises; or 

(e) that the tenant has— 

(i) on or after the 1st day February 1973, in the areas to which the Bombay Rents,  Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Bom. LVII of 1947) applied; or 

(ii) on or after the commencement of this Act, in the Vidarbha and Marathwada areas  of the State, unlawfully sub-let or given on licence the whole or part of the premises or assigned or transferred  in any other manner his interest therein; or  

(f) that the premises were let to the tenant for use as a residence by reason of his being in the  service or employment of the landlord, and that the tenant has ceased, whether before or after the  commencement of this Act, to be in such service or employment; or  

(g) that the premises are reasonably and bona fide required by the landlord for occupation  by himself or by any person for whose benefit the premises are held or where the landlord is a  trustee of a public charitable trust that the premises are required for occupation for the purposes  of the trust; or  

(h) that the premises are reasonably and bona fide required by the landlord for carrying out  repairs which cannot be carried out without the premises being vacated; or 

(i) that the premises are reasonably and bona fide required by the landlord for the immediate  purpose of demolishing them and such demolition is to be made for the purpose of erecting new  building on the premises sought to be demolished; or. 

(j) that the premises let consist a tenement or tenements on the terrace of a building such  tenement or tenements being only in part of the total area of the terrace, and that the premises or  any part thereof are required by the landlord for the purpose of the demolition thereof and  erection or raising of a floor or floors on such terrace; 

Explanation.—

For the purpose of this clause, if the premises let include the terrace or part  thereof, or garages, servants quarters or out-houses (which are not on the terrace), or all or any  one of more of them, this clause shall nevertheless apply; or 

(k) that the premises are required for the immediate purpose of demolition ordered by any  municipal authority or other competent authority; or 

(l) that where the premises are land in the nature of garden or grounds appurtenant to a  building or part of a building or part of a building, such land is required by the landlord for the  erection of a new building which a municipal authority has approved or permitted him to build  thereon; or 

(m) that the rent charged by the tenant for the premises or any part thereof which are sub-let  is in excess of the standard rent and permitted increases in respect of such premises or part or that  the tenant has received any fine, premium, other like sum of consideration in respect of such  premises or part; or 

(n) that the premises have not been used, without reasonable cause for the purpose for which  they were let for for a continuous period of six months immediately preceding the date of the suit. 

(2) No decree for eviction shall be passed on the ground, specified in clause (g) of sub-section  (1), if court is satisfied that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case including the question  whether other reasonable accommodation is available for the landlord or the tenant, greater hardship  would be caused by passing the decree than by refusing to pass it. 

Where the court is satisfied that no hardship would be caused either to the tenant or to the  landlord by passing the decree in respect of such part of the premises, the court shall the decree in  respect of such part only. 

Explanation.—

For the purposes of clause (g) of sub-section (1) the expression “landlord” shall  not include a rent-farmer or rent-collector or estate-manager. 

(3) A landlord shall not be entitled to recover possession of any premises under the provisions of  clause (g) of sub-section (1) if the premises are let to the Central Government in a cantonment area and  such premises, are being used for residence by members of the armed forces of the Union, or their  families.  

(4) The court may pass the decree on the ground specified in clause (h) or (i) of sub-section (1)  only in respect of a part of the premises which in its opinion it is necessary to vacate for carrying out  the work of repair or erection. 

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an  assignment of a decree for eviction obtained on the grounds specified in clauses (g), (h), (i) and (j) of  sub-section (1) shall be unlawful. 

(6) No decree for eviction shall be passed on the ground specified in clauses (i) or (j) of  sub-section (1), unless the Court is satisfied,—

(a) that the necessary funds for the purpose of the erection of new building or for erecting or  raising of a new floor or floors on the terrace are available with the Landlord; 

(b) that the plans and estimates for the new building or new floor or floors have been  properly prepared; 

(c) that the new building or new floor or floors to be erected by the landlord shall, subject to  the provisions of any rules, by-laws or regulations made by municipal authority contain  residential tenements not less than the number of existing tenements which are sought to be  demolished;  

(d) that the landlord has given an undertaking,— 

(i) that the plans and estimates, for the new building or new floor or floors to be  erected by the landlord include premises for each tenant with carpet area equivalent to the  area of the premises in his occupation in the building sought to be demolished subject to a  variation of five per cent. in area;  

(ii) that the premises specified in sub-clause (i) will be offered to the concerned tenant  or tenants in the re-erected building or, as the case may be on the floor to floors;  

(iii) that where the carpet area of the premises in the new building or on the new floor  or floors is more than the carpet area specified in sub-clause (i) the landlord shall, without  prejudice to the liability of the landlord under sub-clause (i), obtain the consent, in writing,  of the tenant or tenants concerned to accept the premises with larger area; and on the tenant  or tenants declining to give such consent the landlord shall be entitled to put the additional  floor area of any permissible use; 

(iv) that the work of demolishing the premises shall be commenced by the landlord not  later than one month, and shall be completed not later than three months, from the date he  recovers possession of the entire premises;  

(v) that the work of erection of the new building or new floor or floors shall be  completed by the landlord not later than fifteen months from the said date: 

Provided that, where the court is satisfied that the work of demolishing the premises  could not be commenced or completed, or the work of erection of the new building or, as  the case may be the new floor or floors could not be completed, within time, for reasons  beyond the control of the landlord, the court may, by order, for reasons to be recorded,  extend the period by such further periods, not exceeding three months at a time as may,  from the time to time, be specified by it, so however that the extended period shall not  exceed twelve months in the aggregate.  

(7) Where the possession of premises is recovered on the ground specified under clause (g), (h),  (i) or (j) of sub-section (1) and the premises and transferred by the landlord, or by operation of law  before the tenant or tenants are placed in occupation, then such transfer shall be subject to the rights  and interests of such tenants.  

(8) For the purposes of clause (m) of sub-section (1), the standard rent or permitted increase in  respect of the part sub-let shall be the amounts bearing such proportion to the standard rent or  permitted increases in respect of the premises as may be reasonable having regard to the extent of the  part sub-let and other relevant considerations. 

(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where the premises let to any person  include— 

(i) the terrace or part thereof; or 

(ii) any one or more of the following structures that is to say, tower-room, sitting-out-rooms,  ornamental structures, architectural features, landings, attics on the terrace of a building, or one or  more rooms of whatsoever description on, such terrace (such room or rooms being in the  aggregate of an area not more than one-sixth of the total area of the terrace); or 

(iii) the terrace or part thereof and any such structure, and the court is satisfied that the terrace or structure or terrace including structure as aforesaid,  are required by the landlord for the purpose of demolition and erection or raising of a floor or  floors on such terrace, the landlord shall be entitled to recover possession of the terrace including  such tower-rooms, sitting-out-rooms, ornamental structures, architectural features, landings, attics  or rooms, the court may make such reduction, if any, in the rent as it may deem just.  

(10) A suit for eviction on the grounds specified in clause (h), (i), (j) or (k) of sub-section (1) may  be filed by the landlord jointly against all the tenants occupying the premises sought to be demolished.  

1. The short title of the Act has been amended as “The Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act” by Mah. 23 of 2012, s. 4. 2. This Act has been repealed by Mah. 23 of 2012, s. 7.

17. Recovery of possession for repairs and re-entry.—

(1) The court shall, when passing a  decree on the ground specified in clause (h) of sub-section (1) of section 16, ascertain from the tenant  whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the premises or part thereof from which he is to be  evicted and if the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election, in the decree and specify in the  decree the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the landlord to  commence the work of repairs. 

(2) If the tenant delivers possession on or before the date specified in the decree, the landlord  shall, two months before the date on which the work of repairs is likely to be completed, give notice to  the tenant of the date on which the said work shall be completed. Within thirty days from the date of  receipt of such notice the tenant shall intimate to the landlord his acceptance of the accommodation  offered and deposit with the landlord rent for one month. If the tenant gives such intimation and makes the deposit, the landlord shall, on completion of the work of repairs, place the tenant in occupation of  the premises or part thereof on the terms and conditions existing on the date of the passing of the  decree for eviction. If the tenant fails to give to such intimation and to make the deposit, the tenant’s  right to occupy the premises shall terminate. 

(3) If, after the tenant has delivered possession on or before the date specified in the decree, the  landlord fails to commence the work of repairs within one month of the specified date or fails to  complete the work within a reasonable time or having completed the work fails to place the tenant in  occupation of the premises in accordance with sub-section (2), the court may, on the application of the  tenant made within one year of the specified date, order the landlord to place him in occupation of the  premises or part thereof on the terms and conditions existing on the date of passing of the decree of  eviction and on such order being made, the landlord and any person who may be in occupation shall  give vacant possession to the tenant of the premises or part thereof. 

(4) Any landlord who, when the tenant has vacated by the date specified in the decree, without  reasonable excuse fails to commence the work of repairs and any landlord or other person in  occupation of the premises who fails to comply with the order made by the court under sub-section (3),  shall, on conviction, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or  with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees or with both.  

18. Recovery of possession for occupation etc., and re-entry.—

(1) Where a decree for eviction  has been passed by the court on the ground specified in clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 16 and  the premises are not occupied within a period of one month from the date the landlord recovers  possession or the premises are re-let within one year of the said date to any person other than the  original tenant, the court may, on the application of the original tenant made within thirteen months  from such date, order the landlord to place him in occupation of the premises, on the terms and  conditions existing on the date of passing of the decree for eviction and, on such order being made, the  landlord and any person who any may be in occupation of the premises shall give vacant possession to  the original tenant. 

(2) Any landlord who recovers possession on the ground specified in clause (g) of sub-section (1)  of section 16 and keeps the premises unoccupied without reasonable excuse and any landlord or other  person in occupation of the premises who fails to comply with the order of the court under sub-section  (1) shall, on conviction, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months  or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees or with both. 

19. Recovery of possession for demolishing building.—

(1) Where a decree for eviction has  been passed by the court on the ground specified in clause (i) or (j) of sub-section (1) of section 16, and  the work of demolishing the premises has not been commenced by the landlord within the period specified in sub-clause (iv) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of the said section, the tenant may give the  landlord a notice of his intention to occupy the premises from which he has been evicted and if the  landlord does not forthwith deliver to him the vacant possession of the premises on the same terms and  conditions on which he occupied them immediately before the eviction, the tenant may make an  application to the court within six weeks from the date on which he delivered vacant possession of the  premises to the landlord.  

(2) If the court is satisfied that the landlord has not substantially commenced the work of  demolishing the premises within the period of one month in accordance with his undertaking, the court  shall order the landlord to deliver to the tenant vacant possession of the premises on the terms and  conditions on which he occupied them immediately before the eviction. On such order being made, the  landlord shall forthwith deliver vacant possession of the premises to the tenant. Such order shall be  deemed to be an order within the meaning of clause (14) of section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,  1908 (V of 1908). 

(3) Any landlord who recovers possession on the ground specified in clause (i) or (j) of  sub-section (1) of section 16, and fails to carry out any undertaking referred to in sub-clause (i), (ii),  (iii), (iv) or (v) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of the said section without any reasonable excuse or fails  to comply with the order of the court under sub-section (1) shall, without prejudice to his liability in  execution to the order under sub-section (2), on conviction, be punishable with imprisonment for a  term which may extend to thirty days or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees or with  both. 

20. Tenants’ right to give notice to landlord of his intention to occupy tenement in new  building.—

Where a decree for eviction has been passed by the court on the ground specified in clause  (i) of sub-section (1) of section 16 and the work of demolishing the premises and of the erection of new  building has been commenced by the landlord, the tenant may, without prejudice to the provisions of  sub-clause (ii) and (iii) of clause (d) of sub-section (6) of section 16 within six months from the date on  which he delivered vacant possession of the premises to the landlord, give notice to the landlord of his  intention to occupy a tenement in the new building on its completion on the following conditions,  namely:— 

(a) that he shall pay to the landlord the standard rent in respect of the tenement: 

Provided that, in respect of a residential tenement, the tenant concerned shall not be required  to pay rent in relation to the area at more than double the rate at which he paid rent for his former  premises immediately before his eviction under the decree, unless the landlord obtains an order of  the court fixing the standard rent in respect of the tenement at higher rate;  

(b) that his occupation of the tenement shall, save as provided in condition (a), be on the  same terms and conditions on which he occupied the premises immediately before the eviction. 

21. Landlord to intimate to tenant date of completion and tenant’s right to occupy premises  in new building.—

(1) The landlord shall, not less than three months before the date on which the  erection of the new building or, completion as the case may be, new floor or floors is likely to be  completed, intimate to the tenant, the date on which the said erection shall be completed. On the said  date, the tenant shall be entitled to occupy the premises assigned to him by the landlord. 

(2) (a) If the tenant fails to occupy the premises within a period of one month from the date on  which he is entitled to occupy it under sub-section (1), the tenant’s right to occupy the said premises  under the said sub-section shall terminate; and the landlord shall be entitled to recover from the tenant  a sum equal to three times the amount of the monthly standard rent in respect of the premises. 

(b) If the landlord fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with the provisions of sub-section  (1) or to place the tenant in occupation of the premises he shall, without prejudice to his liability to  place the tenant in vacant possession of the premises on conviction, be punishable with imprisonment  for a term which may extend to three months or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees or  with both. 

22. Recovery of possession in case of tenancy created during service period.—

(1) Where any  landlord intends to let any premises or any part thereof belonging to him, to his employee, such landlord and the employee may enter into an agreement in writing to create a service tenancy in respect  of the said premises or an agreement in writing to create a service tenancy in respect of the said  premises or any part thereof; and notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the tenancy so  created shall remain in force during the period of service or employment of the tenant with the  landlord. 

(2) After the creation of the service tenancy under sub-section (1), if the tenant ceases to be in the  service or employment of the said landlord either by retirement, resignation, termination of service,  death or for any other reason, the tenant or any other person residing with him or claiming under him  fails to vacate such premises or any part thereof immediately, then, notwithstanding anything contained  in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, the Competent Authority shall, if it is  satisfied, on an application made to it in this behalf by such landlord within thirty days, make an order  that the tenant or any such person as aforesaid shall place the landlord in vacant possession of such  premises or part thereof; and on their refusal or failure to do so the Competent Authority may proceed  to take action under section 45:  

Provided that, the Competent Authority may entertain an application under this sub-section after  the expiry of the said period, if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application in time:  

Provided further that, where the tenant is a workman or an employee whose services are  terminated and a dispute in respect of such termination is pending before a tribunal, court or any other  competent authority, the order for a eviction shall not be passed until such tribunal, court or authority,  under the relevant law, finally upholds the order of such termination. 

Explanation.—

For the purposes of this section, the expression “landlord” shall not include, in  respect of sub-tenant, a tenant who has sub-let any premises, or in respect of a deemed tenant, a tenant  at whose instance the deemed tenant has come in occupation of any premises.

Free Judiciary Coaching
Free Judiciary Notes
Free Judiciary Mock Tests
Bare Acts